Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Non-Traditional Assessments for New Learning Approaches: Competency Evaluation in Project-Based Introductory Materials Science

  • Jonathan Stolk (a1), Steven Krumholz (a2) and Mark Somerville (a3)

Abstract

Over the last twenty years, NSF and the engineering community have called for systemic changes in engineering education, including an emphasis on contextual understanding; increased teaming skills, including collaborative, active learning; and an improved capacity for life-long, self-directed learning. In addition, ABET has called for engineering graduates that demonstrate an ability to apply science and engineering, and ABET requires assessment processes designed to measure student achievement of learning outcomes. Olin College has responded to these calls for change by embracing new learning approaches and assessment techniques, and by developing project-based courses that encourage experiential understanding of content and aid the development of life-long learning skills. To address the assessment needs of new pedagogical approaches, Olin recently instituted a competency based assessment system to accompany the traditional course grading system already in place. The thread of competency assessments provides grading coherency for both faculty and students, and it provides students with valuable information concerning their development of nontraditional skills that they could use to identify shortcomings and further their learning. In this paper, we describe the new pedagogical approaches in Olin's introductory materials science course, and we explain our implementation of the competency assessment system to measure student attainment of both materials science knowledge and broader skills such as teaming, communication, and experimental inquiry.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1 ASEE Deans Council and Corporate Roundtable, The Green Report: Engineering Education for a Changing World (ASEE, Washington D.C., 1994).
2 NRC Board on Engineering Education, Engineering Education: Designing an Adaptive System (National Academy Press, Washington D.C, 1995).
3 Hung, W., Bailey, J. H., Jonassen, D. H., in Knowlton, D. S. and Sharp, D. C. (eds.), New Directions for Teaching and Learning 5 1323 (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 2003).
4 Dochy, F., Segers, M., Bossche, P. Van den, and Gijbels, D., Learning and Instruction 13 533568 (2003).
5 Barrows, H.S., in Wilkerson, L. Gijselaers, W.H. (eds.), New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 68 312 (Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, 1996).
6 Liberal Education Outcomes, A Preliminary Report on Student Achievement in College (AACU, 2005).
7 Duch, B. and Groh, S., in The Power of Problem-Based Learning (Stylus Publishing, Sterling, VA, 2001) 95106.
8 Somerville, M., Chachra, D., Chambers, J., Cooney, E., Dorsey, K., Geddes, J.B., Pratt, G., Rivard, K., Schaffner, A., Stein, L.A., Stolk, J., Westwood, S., and Zastavker, Y. (35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2005) T1A1

Keywords

Non-Traditional Assessments for New Learning Approaches: Competency Evaluation in Project-Based Introductory Materials Science

  • Jonathan Stolk (a1), Steven Krumholz (a2) and Mark Somerville (a3)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed