Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:41:19.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nonresonant Third-Order Nonlinear Polarizability in Linear Conjugated Molecules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

S. H. Stevenson
Affiliation:
Central Research and Development Department, E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., Inc., Experimental Station, Wilmington, Delaware 19898
D. S. Donald
Affiliation:
Central Research and Development Department, E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., Inc., Experimental Station, Wilmington, Delaware 19898
G. R. Meredith
Affiliation:
Central Research and Development Department, E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., Inc., Experimental Station, Wilmington, Delaware 19898
Get access

Abstract

Crude pictures relating molecular features and enhancement of nonresonant second-order hyperpolarizability have been known and successfully utilized in selection and preparation of materials for nonlinear-optical applications for over a decade. On the other hand, other than the requirement of “electron delocalization”, such a useful picture does not exist for nonresonant third-order hyperpolarizability. In pursuit of such a picture, and to obtain a better view of the range of hyperpolarizability magnitudes which might be obtainable, simple linear conjugated molecules have been synthesized and characterized. Liquid solutions of these model compounds were studied using recently developed high precision optical third harmonic generation techniques. Results of these characterizations and a new addition to the picture of structure-property relationships are reported.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hermann, J. P., Ricard, D., and Ducuing, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 223, 178 (1973); J. P. Hermann and J. Ducuing, J. Appl. Phys. 45, 5100 (1974).Google Scholar
2. Rustagi, K. C. and Ducuing, J., Optics Commun. 10, 258 (1974); S. C. Mehendale and K. C. Rustagi, Optics Commun. 28 359 (1979).Google Scholar
3. Hameka, H. F., J. Chem. Phys. 67, 2935 (1977); E. F. Macintyre and H. F. Hameka, J. Chem. Phys., U, 3481 (1978).Google Scholar
4. Ward, J. F. and Elliott, D. S., J. Chem. Phys. 69, 5438 (1978).Google Scholar
5. De Melo, C. P. and Silbey, R., Chem. Phys. Lett. 140, 537 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Maercker, A., Organic Reactions 14, 270 (1965).Google Scholar
7. Gosley, I. and Rowley, A. G., in Organophosphorus Reagents in Organic Synthesis, edited by Cadogan, J. I. G., Academic Press, N.Y (1979); W. S. Wadsworth, Jr., Org. React. (1978).Google Scholar
8. Arnold, Z., Coll. Czech. Chem. Commun. 24, 760 (1959).Google Scholar
9. Grimm, B. and Dahne, S., Journal f. Prakt. Chemie 317, 161 (1975).Google Scholar
10. Nikolajewski, H. E., Dahne, S. and Hirsch, B., Chem. Ber. 100, 2616 (1967); Z. Arnold,Coll. Czech. Chem. Commun. 24, 760 (1959).Google Scholar
11. Hamer, F. M., The Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds. v. 18: The Cyanine Dyes and Related Compounds. edited by Weissberger, A., Interscience, N. Y. 1964.Google Scholar
12. Meredith, G. R., Buchalter, B. and Hanzlik, C., J. Chem. Phys. 78, 1533 and 1543 (1983)Google Scholar
13. Stevenson, S. H. and Meredith, G. R., in Molecular and Polymeric Optoelectronic Material: Fundamentals and Applications, edited by Khanarian, G. (SPIE Proc.682, San Diego, CA 1986) pp. 147152.Google Scholar
14. Meredith, G. R., SPIE Proc. 324, in press.Google Scholar