Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:16:07.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Non-Destructive Evaluation of Strains and Voiding in Passgvated Copper Metallizations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Richard P. Vinci
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Thomas N. Marieb
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
John C. Bravman
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Get access

Abstract

Stress induced voiding in passivated Cu lines was investigated by x-ray strain analysis and in-situ high voltage scanning electron microscope (HVSEM) techniques. Cu lines on a Ta underlayer and Cu lines on an Al underlayer were patterned by a trilayer liftoff technique and passivated with Si3N4. For direct observation of stress voiding, specimens were heated to 350ºC in the HVSEM and then cooled and held at 150ºC. Identical samples were subjected to the same thermal cycle for strain state determination using x-ray techniques. The hydrostatic stress state at each temperature was calculated from the measured strains. Few initial voids were observed after passivation in either sample. After heating to 350ºC and cooling to the dwell temperature, no new voiding was seen in the Ta/Cu lines. Measured hydrostatic strains were half those measured in the Al/Cu lines. Heavy voiding was observed in the Al/Cu lines after cooling to the dwell temperature.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Pai, P. and Ting, C., VMIC Conf. Proc., 258 (1989).Google Scholar
2 Ohmi, T., et al. , Int. Elec. Dev. Meeting, 8, (1991).Google Scholar
3 Borgesen, P., et al. , Appl. Phys. Lett., 60 (14), 1706, (1992).Google Scholar
4 Nix, W., Met. Trans. A, 20A, 2217, (1989).Google Scholar
5 Noyan, I. and Cohen, J., Residual Stress, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY (1987).Google Scholar
6 Cullity, B., Elements of X-ray Diffraction, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA (1978)Google Scholar
7 Flinn, P. and Chiang, C., J. Appl. Phys., 67 (6), 2927 (1990).Google Scholar
8 Besser, P., et al. , MRS Symp. Proc., 239, 233, (1992).Google Scholar
9 Follstaedt, D., et al. , MRS Symp. Proc., 225, 225 (1992).Google Scholar
10 Madden, M., et al. , MRS Symp. Proc., 265, 33 (1992).Google Scholar
11 Jones, S., et al. , SPIE Adv. Resist Tech. and Proc., 1086, 555 (1989).Google Scholar
12 Hu, C.-K., et al. , VMIC Conf. Proc., 181 (1986).Google Scholar
13 Holloway, K and Fryer, P., MRS Symp. Proc., 181. 41 (1990).Google Scholar
14 Flinn, P. and Waychunas, G., J. Vac. Sci. and Tech., B6, 1749 (1988).Google Scholar
15 Dieter, G., Mechanical Metallurgy, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY (1986).Google Scholar
16 Bolz, R. and Tuve, G., Handbook of Applied Engineering Science, The Chemical Rubber Co., Boca Raton, FL (1970).Google Scholar
17 Thornton, J., Thin Solid Films,171, 5 (1989).Google Scholar
18 Besser, P., to be presented at Spring MRS Meeting, (1993).Google Scholar
19 Chaudhari, P., J. Vac. Sci. Tech., 9, 520 (1972).Google Scholar
20 Townsend, P., PhD Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford CA (1987).Google Scholar
21 Flinn, P., J. Mater. Res., 6 (7), 1498, (1991).Google Scholar
22 Vinci, R. and Bravman, J., to be presented at Spring MRS Meeting, (1993).Google Scholar