Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-26T19:13:08.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nondestructive Characterization Of The Surface Aging Of HgI2 Crystal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

H. Yao ,
J. C. Erickson ,
R. B. James  and
M. Natarajan
H. Yao
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Center for Microelectronic and Optical Materials Research, and Department of Electrical Engineering, Lincoln, NE 68588-0511, hyao@unl.edu
J. C. Erickson
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Center for Microelectronic and Optical Materials Research, and Department of Electrical Engineering, Lincoln, NE 68588-0511, hyao@unl.edu
R. B. James
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories Livermore, CA 94551
M. Natarajan
Affiliation:
TN Technologies, Round Rock, TX 78680
Get access

Abstract

Variable angle spectroscopic ellipsometry (VASE) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements have been employed to characterize the surface aging of HgI2 crystals. A surface model including top surface roughness and subsurface defects was established and studied by VASE analysis, as a function of real time, after the 10% KI chemical etching. In this model, the surface defects associated with the surface aging were modeled by the Bruggeman effective-medium approximation (EMA) as a HgI2/voids mixed layer. The relative 2-dimensional (2D) surface-defectdensities were monitored as the surface aging proceeds. The VASE measurements indicated that high surface aging rates were related to high initial effective 2D surface-defect densities. The AFM profile revealed increasing physical surface roughness as surface aging took place. The cleaved HgI2 crystal surface presented a smooth surface and the lowest surface aging rate, while the as-grown HgI2 surface also presented a very low surface aging. The HgI2 surfaces baked at elevated temperatures presented accelerated surface aging phenomena after a 30 min. baking.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 442: Symposium E – Defects in Electronic Materials II , 1996 , 611
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wing, W. R., Nucl. Instrum. Meethods 96, 615 (1971).Google Scholar
2. Swierkowski, S. P., Armantrout, G. A., and Wichne, R., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS–21, 302 (1974).Google Scholar
3. Ponpon, J. P., Stuck, R., Siffert, P., Meyer, B., and Schwab, C., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS–22, 182 (1975).Google Scholar
4. Dabrowski, A. J., Szymczyk, W. M., Iwanczyk, J. S., Kusmiss, J. H., Drummond, W., and Ames, L., Nucl. Instrum. Methods 213, 89 (1983).Google Scholar
5. Howes, J. H. and Watling, J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 16, 207 (1983).Google Scholar
6. Yao, H. and Johs, B., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 302, 341 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Schieber, M., Roth, M., Yao, H., DeVries, M., James, R. B., and Goorsky, M., J. Crystal Growth 146, 15 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Yao, H., Lim, L. A., James, R. B., Schieber, M., and Natarajan, M., Nucl. Instrum. Methods (to be published) (1996).Google Scholar
9. Azzam, R. M. A. and Bashara, N. M., Ellipsometry and Polarized Light (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977).Google Scholar
10. Aspnes, D. E., in Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, edited by Palik, E. D. (Academic, New York, 1985), p. 89.Google Scholar
11. Bao, X. J., Schlesinger, T. E., James, R. B., Stulen, R. H., Ortale, C., and Cheng, A. Y., J. Appl. Phys. 68, 86 (1990).Google Scholar
12. Aspnes, D. E., Theeten, J. B., and Hottier, F., Phys. Rev. B 20, 3292 (1979).Google Scholar
13. Yao, H. and Snyder, P. G., Thin Solid Films 206, 283 (1991).Google Scholar
14. Yao, H., Johs, B., and James, R. B., Phys. Rev. B (to be published).Google Scholar