Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:52:19.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nitrogen and Water Sorption Properties of Ethyl-Substituted Silica Aerogels and Xerogels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Chunling Liu  and
Sridhar Komarneni
Chunling Liu
Affiliation:
Intercollege Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Sridhar Komarneni
Affiliation:
Intercollege Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802. Also with the Department of Agronomy
Get access

Abstract

High surface area ethyltrimethoxysilane (ETMS) modified silica aerogels and xerogels were synthesized by cohydrolyzing the mixtures of ETMS and tetramethylorthosilicate (TMOS). The effects of ETMS content, pH value and solvent addition were investigated. The surface area, pore structure and hydrophobicity were studied using nitrogen and water sorption measurements. By ETMS modification of TMOS gels, high surface area, density and hydrophobicity were achieved. The 25 mole% ETMS-75 mole% TMOS was found to be the best composition for both aerogel and xerogel, which are hydrophobic and have surface areas of 1221 and 832 m2/g, respectively.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 371: Symposium W1 – Advances in Porous Materials , 1994 , 217
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Liu, C., Zhang, H., Komarneni, S. and Pantano, C. G., J. Sol-Gel Sci. & Tech., 1, 141 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Kido, H., Malla, P. B. and Komarneni, S., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 175, 219 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Malla, P. B., Komameni, S., Taguchi, H. and Kido, H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 74, 12 2988 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Fricke, J. and Emmerling, A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 75 [8], 2027 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Schwertfeger, F., Galubitt, W. and Schubert, U., J. Non-Crystalline Solids, 145, 85 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Liu, C. and Komameni, S., presented in Am. Ceram. Soc. Ann. Meeting, (1994).Google Scholar
7. Liu, C. and Komarneni, S., to be published in J. Porous Mat.Google Scholar
8. Gesser, H. D. and Goswami, P. C., Chemical Reviews, 89, 765 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Singh, A. K. and Pantano, C. G., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 271, 795 (1992).Google Scholar
10. White, D. A., Oleff, S. M. and Boyer, R. D., Adv. Ceram. Mat., 2, 1 45 (1987).Google Scholar
11. Yamanka, S. and Komarneni, S., U. S. Patent No. 5,058,442 (1991).Google Scholar
12. Brunauer, S., Emmett, P. and Teller, E., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 60, 309 (1938).Google Scholar
13. Barrett, E. P., Joyner, L. G. and Halenda, P. P., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 73 373 (1951).Google Scholar
14. Brunauer, S., Mikhail, R. S. and Boder, E. E., J. Colloid Interface Sci., 26, 45 (1968).Google Scholar
15. Smith, K. A., J. Org. Chem., 51 3827 (1986).Google Scholar