Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T16:05:01.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nanostructured alumina doped TiO2 ceramics for gas sensors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Young Jin Choi ,
Amit Bandyopadhyay  and
Susmita Bose
Young Jin Choi
Affiliation:
cyj0590@hotmail.com, washington state university, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering
Amit Bandyopadhyay
Affiliation:
amitband@wsu.edu, washington state university, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, United States
Get access

Abstract

Nanostructured TiO2 based ceramics were synthesized using citrate-nitrate auto combustion method with different concentrations of aluminum oxide as dopant. The powder x-ray diffraction data showed that synthesized TiO2 powders, pure as well as alumina doped TiO2 had anatase phase. Dopant concentration was varied between 0 and 15 wt%. Particle size analysis showed that the particle size was in the range of 50 to 80nm for nanosized TiO2 calcined between 600 and 800°C. Average particle size of doped powders was generally less than pure TiO2. BET specific average surface area was between 10 and 25 m2/g. Doping upto 10wt% alumina is not effective in retarding anatase crystallite growth. The resistance of Al doped TiO2 sample is found to be lower than that of pure TiO2. Al2O3 doped TiO2 sensor was found to be selective to CO sensing at an operating temperature of 600 °C.

Keywords

sensornanostructureceramic
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 900: Symposium O – Nanoparticles and Nanostructures in Sensors and Catalysis , 2005 , 0900-O10-06
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Akbar, S. A. and Park, C. O., J. Mater. Sci. 38, 4237 (2003).Google Scholar
2. Li, G.J. and Kawi, S.. Mater. Lett. 34, 99–102 (1998).Google Scholar
3. Ferroni, M., Guidi, V., Faglia, G. M., Nelli, P. and Sberveglieri, G., Nanostructured Materials, 7, 709–718 (1996).Google Scholar
4. Yoon, K. H., Cho, J., and Kang, D.H., Materials Research Bulletin, 34 [9], 1451~1461 (1999).Google Scholar
5. Akbar, S. A., Younkman, L. B., and Dutta, P. K., 160–167 in Polymer in sense, Edited by N. Akmal and A.M. Usmani, 14, (1998)Google Scholar
6. Kumar, K. -N.P., Keizer, K. and Burggraaf, A. J., J. Mater. Chem. 3, 917–922 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Yang, J., Huang, Y. X. and Ferreira, J. M., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 16 1933–1935 (1997).Google Scholar
8. Kim, J., et al., J. Eur. Ceram.Soc. 21, 2863–2872 (2001).Google Scholar
9. Kumar, S. Rajesh, et al., Mater. Lett. 43 [5–6], 286–290 (2000).Google Scholar
10. Hatta., K. Etc., J. crystal growth, 163, 279~284 (1996).Google Scholar
11. Birkefeld, A. M., Akbar, S. A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 75 [11], 2964–2968 (1992).Google Scholar
12. Tai, W.-P. and Oh, J.-H., J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 13, 391–394 (2002).Google Scholar
13. Tai, W.-P., et al., Sens. Actuators B: Chemical, 96 [3], 477–483 (2003).Google Scholar
14. Cullity, B. D., Elements of X-Ray Diffraction (second ed.), Addison-Wesley, 284 (1978).Google Scholar
15. Smyth, D. M., Prog. Solid State Chem. 15, 145–171 (1984).Google Scholar
16. Slepetys, R. A. and Vaughan, P. A., J. Phy. Chem. 73, 2157~2162 (1979).Google Scholar
17. Savage, N. O., Akbar, S. A., Dutta, P. K., Sens. Actuators B, 72 239~248 (2001).Google Scholar
18. Savage, N. O., Ginwall, A., Patton, B. R., Akbar, S. A., Dutta, P. K., Sens. Actuators B 79 17~27 (2001).Google Scholar
19. Akbar, S. A., Dutta, P. K., NSF Center for Industrial Sensors and Measurements (CISM).Google Scholar