Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:11:11.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nano-Mechanical Investigation of the Byssal Cuticle, a Protective Coating of a BioElastomer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Niels Holten-Andersen ,
Nelle Slack ,
Frank Zok  and
J. Herbert Waite
Niels Holten-Andersen
Affiliation:
Biomolecular Science & Engineering, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Nelle Slack
Affiliation:
Materials Department, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Frank Zok
Affiliation:
Materials Department, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
J. Herbert Waite
Affiliation:
Biomolecular Science & Engineering, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Get access

Abstract

The mechanical properties of the mussel byssal thread have been investigated via nano-indentation, with the emphasis on the differences between the cuticle and the fibrous interior. The cuticle hardness was found to be 30–40% higher than that of the underlying fibrous interior. In contrast, the Young's moduli in the two regions were virtually identical to one another. Elemental analysis via energy dispersive spectroscopy indicated surprisingly high levels of Al and Br in the cuticle considering the low amounts found in seawater. A potential role of Al in byssal thread mechanics is discussed in light of the unique capability of the cuticle to accommodate strains of 70% by the underlying fibrils in the core without delamination.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 844: Symposium Y – Mechanical Properties of Bio-Inspired and Biological Materials , 2004 , Y3.7/R3.7
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Tamarin, A., & Keller, P.J. (1972) J. Ultrastruct. Res. 40:401–416 Google Scholar
2. Young, G.A., & Crisp, D.J. (1982) Marine animals and adhesion. In: Allen, K.W., editor. Adhesion 6. Barking, England: Applied Science Publishers Ltd, 19–39 Google Scholar
3. Waite, J.H. (2002) Integr. Comp. Biol. 42:1172–1180 Google Scholar
4. Waite, J.H. (1992) Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation 19:27–54 Google Scholar
5. Benedict, C.V., & Waite, J.H. (1986) J. Morphol. 189(2):171–181 Google Scholar
6. Waite, J.H. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258:2911–2915 Google Scholar
7. Taylor, S.W., Waite, J.H., Ross, M.M., Shabanowitz, J., & Hunt, D.F. (1994) J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 116:10803–10804 Google Scholar
8. Taylor, S.W., Luther, G.W., & Waite, J.H. (1994) Inorg. Chem. 33:5819–5824 Google Scholar
9. Taylor, S.W., Chase, D.B., Emptage, M.H., Nelson, M.J., & Waite, J.H. (1996) Inorg. Chem. 35:7572–7577 Google Scholar
10. Burzio, L.A., & Waite, J.H. (2000) Biochemistry 39:11147–11153 Google Scholar
11. Höök, F., Kasemo, B., Nylander, T., Fant, C., Sott, K., & Elwing, H. (2001) Anal. Chem. 74: 5796–5804 Google Scholar
12. Haemers, S., van der Leeden, M.C., Koper, G.J.M., & Frens, G. (2002) Langmuir 18(12): 4903–4907.Google Scholar
13. Kong, H.J., Wong, E., & Mooney, D.J. (2003) Macromolecules 36:4582–4588 Google Scholar
14. Oliver, W.C., & Pharr, G.M. (1992) J. Mater. Res. 7(6):1564–1583 Google Scholar
15. Vaccaro, E., & Waite, J.H. (2001) Biomacromolecules 2:906–911 Google Scholar