Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T15:29:02.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nanoindentation of Soft Films on Hard Substrates:The Importance of Pile-Up

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

T. Y. Tsui ,
W. C. Oliver  and
G. M. Pharr
T. Y. Tsui
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Rice University, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005
W. C. Oliver
Affiliation:
Nanoinstruments Inc., 1001 Larson Drive, Oak Ridge, TN 37830
G. M. Pharr
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Rice University, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005
Get access

Abstract

Nanoindentation is a common technique for measuring the mechanical properties of thin films. Here, we address the potential measurement errors caused by pile-up when soft films deposited on hard substrates are tested by nanoindentation methods. Pile-up is exacerbated in soft film / hard substrate systems because of the constraint the substrate exerts on plastic deformation of the film. To experimentally examine pile-up effects, aluminum films with thicknesses of 240 and 1700 nm were deposited on hard glass substrates and tested by standard nanoindentation techniques. The aluminum/glass system is interesting because the film and substrate have similar elastic moduli; thus, any unusual behavior in the nanoindentation results may be attributed to differences in the plastic flow characteristics alone. A detailed scanning electron microscopy examination of nanoindentation hardness impressions in the film revealed that common methods for analyzing nanoindentation data underestimate the true contact areas by as much as 80%, which results in overestimations of the hardness and modulus by as much as 80% and 35%, respectively. The sources of these errors and their influence on the measurement of hardness and elastic modulus are discussed, and a simple model for the composite hardness of the film/substrate system is developed. The model could prove useful in measuring the hardness and elastic modulus of soft-film / hard substrate systems when it is not possible to make indentations shallow enough to avoid the substrate influences.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 436: Symposium CC – Thin Films Stresses and Mechanical Properties VI , 1996 , 207
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Pharr, G.M. and Oliver, W.C., MRS Bull. XVII, 28 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Burnett, P.J. and Rickerby, D.S., Thin Solid Film 148, 41–50 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Burnett, P.J. and Rickerby, D.S., Thin Solid Films 148, 51–65 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Doerner, M.F. and Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res 1, 601–609 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Doerner, M.F., Gardner, D.S., and Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res. 1, 845–851 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Doerner, M.F. and Nix, W.D., CRC Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Science 14, 225–268 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Fabes, B.D. and Oliver, W.C., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 188, 127–132 (1990).Google Scholar
9. LaFontaine, W.R., Yost, B., and Li, C.-Y., J. Mater. Res. 5, 776–783 (1990).Google Scholar
10. Stone, D., LaFontaine, W.R., Alexopoulos, P., Wu, T.W., and Li, C.-Y., J. Mater. Res 3, 141–147 (1988).Google Scholar
11. Stone, D.S., Journal of Electronic Packing 112, 41–46 (1990).Google Scholar
12. Tsui, T.Y., Oliver, W.C., and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 11, (1996).Google Scholar
13. Bolshakov, A., Oliver, W.C., and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 11, (1996).Google Scholar