Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T20:37:11.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Monte-Carlo Investigation of Avalanche in Adhesion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

Brian S. Good
Affiliation:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH 44135.
Amitava Banerjea
Affiliation:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH 44135. Physics Department, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242.
John R. Smith
Affiliation:
Physics Department, General Motors Research Laboratories, Warren, MI 48090-9055.
Guillermo H. Bozzolo
Affiliation:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH 44135.
John Ferrante
Affiliation:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH 44135.
Get access

Abstract

Recently it has been proposed that as two metal surfaces are gradually brought toward contact, atomic layers can collapse or avalanche together when the interfacial spacing falls below a critical distance. This avalanche can occur regardless of the stiffness of external supports and is accompanied by a discontinuous drop in the adhesive binding energy. Here we re-examine this phenomenon using a simple zero-temperature Monte-Carlo simulation using the Equivalent Crystal Method. In particular, we investigate the effect of loss of registry between the two contacting surfaces in order to delimit the circumstances under which avalanche can occur. We find that the avalanche is suppressed when the two surfaces are sufficiently far out of registry, at least when only a few layers near the surface are allowed to relax.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Smith, John R., Bozzolo, Guillermo H., Banerjea, Amitava, and Ferrante, John, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1269 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Smith, John R. and Banerjea, Amitava, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2451 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Smith, John R. and Banerjea, Amitava, Phys. Rev. B 37, 10411 (1988); John R. Smith, Tom Perry, and A. Banerjea, Atomistic Simulation of Materials, Vaclav Vitek and David J. Srolovitz eds. (Plenum, New York 1989), p. 279.Google Scholar
4. Pethica, J. B. and Sutton, A. P., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 6, 2494 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Binnig, G., Rohrer, H., Gerber, Ch., and Weibel, E., Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 57 (1982).Google Scholar
6. Binnig, G., Quate, C. F., and Gerber, Ch., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 930 (1986).Google Scholar
7. Banerjea, Amitava, Ferrante, John, and Smith, John R., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 140, 89 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Taylor, P. A. and Dodson, B. W., Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 35, 708 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Smith, John R. and Banerjea, Amitava, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 6, 812 (1988).Google Scholar
10. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H. and Teller, E., J. Chem. Phys. 6, 1087 (1953).Google Scholar
11. Banerjea, A. and Smith, John R., Phys. Rev. B 37, 6632 (1988), and references therein.Google Scholar
12. Smith, John R., Gay, Jack G., and Arlinghaus, Frank J., Phys. Rev. B 21, 2201 1980).. For Ni(100) results, see X. Zhu, J. Hermanson, F. J. Arlinghaus, J. G. Gay, Richter, and J. R. Smith, Phys. Rev. B 2, 4426 (1984).Google Scholar