Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:41:19.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular volume and polarizability in the amorphous dielectric Zr0.2Sn0.2Ti0.6O2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

S. C. Barron
Affiliation:
scb43@cornell.edu, Cornell University, Materials Science and Engineering, 214 Bard Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, United States, 607 255 3615, 607 255 2365
R. B. van Dover
Affiliation:
rbv2@cornell.edu, Cornell University, Materials Science and Engineering, United States
Get access

Abstract

The dielectric constant of a material is strongly dependent on both the polarizability and the density of the material through the Clausius Mossotti equation. While the atomic polarizability depends on the stoichiometry of the constituent atoms, the molecular polarizability is a function of the atoms’ short range bonding structure and hence can be strongly dependent on processing conditions. Since the density of the material also depends on the thermally activated diffusivity of atoms during processing, varying the processing temperatures has an effect on both the molecular polarizability and the density. The dielectric constant of Zr0.2Sn0.2Ti0.6O2 is shown to be a strong function of the substrate temperature during sputter deposition with the highest value ∼55 at 200 °C and lower values at both higher and lower process temperatures. We have investigated the bonding structure and density of the oxide dielectric deposited at a variety of substrate temperatures in order to elucidate the relative effects of each.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 van Dover, R. B., Schneemeyer, L. F., and Fleming, R. M., Nature 392, 162 (1998).Google Scholar
2 Wilk, G. D., Wallace, R. M., and Anthony, J. M., J. Appl. Phys. 89, 5243 (2001).Google Scholar
3 van Dover, R. B. and Schneemeyer, L. F., IEEE Electron Device Letters 19, 329 (1998).Google Scholar
4 Lu, X. B., Wang, Y. P., Ling, H. Q., and Liu, Z. G., J. Non-crystalline Solids 303, 88 (2002).Google Scholar
5 Nakagawara, O., Toyta, Y., Kobayashi, M., Yoshino, Y., Katayama, Y., Tabata, H., and Kawai, T., J. Appl. Phys. 80, 388 (1996).Google Scholar