Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:41:10.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modelling of the Evolution of Porewater Chemistry in a Cementitious Repository

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

A. Haworth ,
S.M. Sharland  and
C.J. Tweed
A. Haworth
Affiliation:
Theoretical Physics Division, Harwell Laboratory, Oxfordshire, U.K.
S.M. Sharland
Affiliation:
Theoretical Physics Division, Harwell Laboratory, Oxfordshire, U.K.
C.J. Tweed
Affiliation:
Theoretical Physics Division, Harwell Laboratory, Oxfordshire, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

The current concept for disposal of low- or intermediate-level nuclear waste in the UK includes a largely cementitious backfill. An important factor in determining nuclide release rates from the repository is the pH in the near-field. In this paper, we describe development of a coupled chemistry/transport model of cement degradation and its application in determining the evolution of the chemistry within the repository. In particular, the effect of the cement formulation and interaction with groundwater species on the evolution of the pH is examined. The model is sufficiently flexible to consider a number of different repository scenarios.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 176: Symposium U – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII , 1989 , 175
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Atkinson, A. and Guppy, R., ‘The evolution of pH in a radwaste repository: Leaching of modified cements and reactions with groundwater’, Harwell Laboratory Report AERE-R12961 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Haworth, A., Sharland, S.M. and Tweed, C.J., ‘Modelling of the degradation of cement in a nuclear waste repository’, Proc. 12th Int. Symposium for the Scientific Basis of Nuclear Waste Management, Berlin MRS Vol 127 p 447–454 (1988)Google Scholar
3. Berner, U., ‘Modelling the Incongruent Dissolution of Hydrated Cement Minerals’, Radiochimica Acta, Proc.Int.Conf. on Chemistry and Migration Behaviour of Actinides and Fission Products in the Geosphere, Munich (1987).Google Scholar
4. Atkinson, A., Everitt, N.M. and Guppy, R, ‘Evolution of pH in a Radwaste Repository: Experimental Simulation of Cement Leaching’, Harwell Laboratory Report AERE-R 12594 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Haworth, A., Sharland, S.M., Tasker, P.W. and Tweed, C.J., ‘A Guide to the Coupled Chemical Equilibria and Migration Code CHEOMATE’, Harwell Laboratory Report NSS-R113 (1988)Google Scholar
6. Parkhurst, D.L, Thorstenson, D.C and Plummer, L.N., U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Investigations, 80–96 (1985)Google Scholar
7. Greenberg, S.A. and Chang, T.N., J. Phys. Chem., 69, p182 (1965)Google Scholar
8. Atkinson, A. and Hearne, J.A., ‘An Assessment of the Long Term Durability of Cement in Radioactive Waste Repositories’, Harwell Laboratory Report AERE-R-11465 (1987)Google Scholar