Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T23:10:57.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modeling Misfit Dislocation Arrays for the Growth of Low-Defect Density AlSb on Si

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Anitha Jallipalli ,
G. Balakrishnan ,
S.H. Huang ,
A. Khoshakhlagh ,
L.R. Dawson  and
D.L. Huffaker
Anitha Jallipalli
Affiliation:
anitha@unm.edu, University of New Mexico, Center for High Technology Materials, 1313 Goddard S.E., Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106, United States, 5052727845
G. Balakrishnan
Affiliation:
gunny@unm.edu, University of New Mexico, Center for High Technology Materials, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106, United States
S.H. Huang
Affiliation:
shuang@ece.unm.edu, University of New Mexico, Center for High Technology Materials, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106, United States
A. Khoshakhlagh
Affiliation:
karezou@unm.edu, University of New Mexico, Center for High Technology Materials, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106, United States
L.R. Dawson
Affiliation:
rdawson@chtm.unm.edu, University of New Mexico, Center for High Technology Materials, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106, United States
D.L. Huffaker
Affiliation:
huffaker@chtm.unm.edu, University of New Mexico, Center for High Technology Materials, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106, United States
Get access

Abstract

We present analytical models and experimental results to describe low-defect density growth (∼ 6 × 105/cm2) of highly mismatched antimonides on Si and GaAs substrates, with strain relief achieved at the growth interface through periodic, 90° interfacial misfit dislocations (IMF). We use molecular mechanics (MM) based modeling techniques to understand, at the atomic level, the spontaneous formation and energetics of these IMF. We have modeled, grown and characterized two systems extensively, these are - AlSb on Si with ∼ 13% mismatch and GaSb on GaAs with 7.83% lattice mismatch. Growth of these materials by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) and subsequent High-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy (HR-TEM) has indicated that there is no tetragonal distortion in these two systems despite the high lattice mismatch. Instead, the mismatched epi-layers spontaneously form periodic IMF arrays that run along both [110] and [1-10] directions and relieve almost 100% of the strain in a few monolayers of deposition. To model this form of strain relief, we use existing theories of strain relief adapted for very high strain conditions and we also use bond energetics to model the strain-relieving interface. The IMFs in these systems are periodic and so is the deviation in bond lengths and bond angles, which restricts our calculation space to a finite number of elements. We shall also demonstrate extensive growth and characterization results of the materials grown with a particular emphasis on the strain-relieving interface to show excellent agreement of the experimental data with the proposed models. The high quality and low-defect density in AlSb grown on Si, has helped us demonstrate optically pumped IR VCSELs and edge emitters monolithically on Si (001) and this data will also be presented.

Keywords

SbSidefects
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 934: Symposium I – Silicon-Based Microphotonics , 2006 , 0934-I09-05
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Malik, R.J., Ziel, J.P. van der, Levine, B.F., Bethea, C.G., Walker, J., J. Appl. Phys. 59, 3909 (1986).Google Scholar
[2] Tu, K-N., Mayer, J.W. and Feldman, L.C., Electronic Thin Film Science, Macmillan publishing Company, New York, NY, 1992.Google Scholar
[3] Balakrishnan, G., Huang, Shenghong, Rotter, Thomas J., Stintz, Andreas, Dawson, L.R., Malloy, K.J., Xu, H. and Huffaker, D.L, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 2058 (2004).Google Scholar
[4] Sun, X.Y., Bommena, R., Burckel, D., Frauenglass, A., Fairchild, M.N., Brueck, S.R.J., Garrett, G.A., Wraback, M. and Hersee, S.D., J. Appl. Phys. 95,1450 (2004).Google Scholar
[5] Rocher, A., Solid State Phenomena, 19/20, 563 (1991).Google Scholar
[6] Rocher, A., Kang, J.M., Atmani, H., Crestou, J., Vanderschaeve, G., Lassabatere, L., Bonnet, R., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. No. 117, Section 7, paper presented at Microsc. Semicond. Mater. Conf. Oxford, 25-28 March, 509 (1991).Google Scholar
[7] Trampert, A., Tournie, E., Ploog, K.H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 2265 (1995).Google Scholar
[8] Huang, S.H., Balakrishnan, G., Khoshakhlagh, A., Jallipalli, A., Dawson, L.R., Huffaker, D.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. (2005) accepted for publication.Google Scholar
[9] Balakrishnan, G., Huang, S., Dawson, L.R., Xin, Y.-C., Conlin, P., Huffaker, D.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 0341051 (2005).Google Scholar
[10] People, R. and Bean, J.C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 322 (1985).Google Scholar
[11] Matthews, J. W. and Blakeslee, A. E., J. Cryst. Growth 27, 118 (1974).Google Scholar
[12] Merwe, Jan H. Van Der, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 33A, 2475 (2002).Google Scholar
[13] Kuronen, A. et. al, Europhys. Lett. 55(1), 19 (2001).Google Scholar
[14] Balakrishnan, G., Huang, S., Khoshakhlagh, A., Hill, P., Amtout, A., Krishna, S., Donati, G.P., Dawson, L.R., Huffaker, D.L., IEE Electron. Lett. 41, 531 (2005).Google Scholar
[15] Balakrishna, G., Huang, S.H., Khoshakhlagh, A., Jallipalli, A., Rotella, P., Amtout, A., Krishna, S., Dawson, L.R., Haines, C.P., Huffaker, D.L., IEE Electron. Lett. (2005) accepted for publication.Google Scholar
[16] Teufel, Stefan, Adiabatic Perturbation Theory in Quantum Dynamics, first ed, Springer, 2003.Google Scholar