Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T23:48:55.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metastable Pitting Corrosion of Aluminum, Al-Cu, and Al-Si Thin Films in Dilute HF Solutions and its Relevancy to the Processing of Integrated Circuit Interconnections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

J. R. Scully  and
D. E. Peebles
J. R. Scully
Affiliation:
University of Virginia, Department of Materials Science, Center for Electrochemical Sciences and Engineering, Charlottesville, VA 22903
D. E. Peebles
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185
Get access

Abstract

We have investigated the pitting corrosion of Al, Al-Cu, and Al-Si thin films in dilute hydrofluoric acid solution. Additions of Cu and, to a lesser extent, Si cause an increase in open circuit potentials (OCP), pit densities and pit sizes as compared to pure Al. Pits in Al-Cu alloys are associated with Cu depleted grain boundaries which are galvanically coupled to adjacent θ-phase precipitates. Pits formed in Al-Si alloys are associated with the Al matrix which is galvanically coupled to Si nodules. θ-Al2Cu has different electrochemical characteristics than Al even though both maintain a thin Al surface oxide. θ-Al2Cu has a more positive OCP, above the average pit repassivation potential for pure Al. Since θ-Al2Cu supports cathodic reactions at enhanced rates compared to pure Al, its presence raises the potential of the adjacent pure Al grain boundary to values near its average breakdown potential and above its average repassivation potential. Metastable pitting is thus promoted.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 225: Symposium G – Materials Reliability Issues in Microelectronics , 1991 , 343
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Thomas, S. and Berg, H.M, Trans. IEEE Compon., Hybr., Manuf. Technol., CHMT-10, 252 (1987).Google Scholar
2. Scully, J.R., Frankenthal, R.P., Hanson, K.J., Siconolfi, D.J., Sinclair, J.D., J. Electrochem. 137(4), 1365 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Bond, A.P., Boiling, G.F., Domian, H.A., Biloni, H., J. Electrochem. 113 773, (1966).Google Scholar
4. Williams, D.E., Newman, R.C., Song, Q., Kelly, R.G., Nature, 350, 216, March (1991).Google Scholar
5. Frankel, G.S., Corrosion Science, 30(12), 1203–1218, (1990).Google Scholar
6. Frankel, G.S., Stockert, L., Hunkeler, F., Bohni, H., Corrosion J., 43(7), 429–436, (1987).Google Scholar
7. Holliger, R., Bohni, H., In Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer Aided Acquisition and Analysis of Corrosion Data, Kendig, M.W., Bertocci, U., Strutt, John eds., ECS PV 85–3, 200–209, (1985).Google Scholar