Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:25:38.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanism of Vapor Phase Hydration In High-Sodium Waste Glasses from Computer Simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Fernando C. Perez-Cardenas
Affiliation:
Vitreous State Laboratory, The Catholic University of America Washington, DC 20064.
Hao Gan
Affiliation:
Vitreous State Laboratory, The Catholic University of America Washington, DC 20064.
Xiaodong Lu
Affiliation:
Vitreous State Laboratory, The Catholic University of America Washington, DC 20064.
Ian L. Pegg
Affiliation:
Vitreous State Laboratory, The Catholic University of America Washington, DC 20064.
Get access

Abstract

The kinetics of vapor phase hydration (VHT) of high-sodium waste glasses often exhibits incubation, fast-rising, and final stages. The incubation stage is characterized by the slow and gradual appearance of transformed regions on the surface of the glass, signaling the initiation of the phase transformation. This is followed by a fast-rising stage, during which most of the transformation takes place. The final stage is characterized by the slower alteration of the remaining glass phase, which can have a duration orders of magnitude longer than those of the previous stages. While the Avrami equation provides a good representation of these features, the origin of the late-stage slow-down in the Avrami model is unrealistic for the VHT process. Computer simulations based on cell models have been used to investigate possible mechanistic origins. The models consider the formation of multiple alteration phases and simulate the complex interplay among the several microscopic mechanisms involved in the hydration process. The models assume that the transformation from the original pristine glass to the final stable altered phase occurs in two steps: from glass to a metastable phase, and then from a metastable to a stable phase. The results indicate that the late-stage slow-down can be reproduced as a result of the build-up of species that are incompatible with the stable phase or by the occlusion of the surface due to the growth of a surface phase that is less permeable to water. The simulation results are in good general agreement with the features of the experimental data.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bechtel National, Inc., “Design, Construction, and Commissioning of the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant,” Contract Number: DE-AC27-01RV14136, U.S. Department of Energy, office of River Protection (12/11/00).Google Scholar
2. Luo, J.S.et al, “Natural Analogues of Nuclear Waste Glass Corrosion,” ANL-98/22, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois (1998).Google Scholar
3. Mazer, J.J.et al, “Obsidians and Tektites: Natural Analogues for Water Diffusion in Nuclear Waste Glasses,” Material Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 257, 513520 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Vienna, J.D.et al, “Hanford Immobilized LAW Product Acceptance: Initial Tanks Focus Area Testing Data Package,” PNNL-13101, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington (2000).Google Scholar
5. Schultz, R.L.et al, “Hanford Immobilized LAW Product Acceptance: Tanks Focus Area Testing Data Package II,” PNNL-13344, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington (2000).Google Scholar
6. Lu, X., Perez-Cardenas, F.C., Gan, H., Buechele, A.C., and Pegg, I.L., “Kinetics of Alteration in Vapor Phase Hydration Tests on High Sodium Waste Glass,” to be published in the Proceedings of The American Ceramic Society Symposium (2001).Google Scholar
7. Gan, H. and Pegg, I.L., “Development of Property-Composition Models for RPP-WTP LAW Glasses,” VSL Final Report, August 6, 2001.Google Scholar
8. Christian, J.W., The Theory of Transformations in Metals and Alloys, 2nd edition, Pergamon Press, Oxford, (1975).Google Scholar
9. Ebert, W.L. and Bates, J. K., “The Reaction of Synthetic Nuclear Waste Glass in Steam and Hydrothermal Solution,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 176, 339346 (1990).Google Scholar
10. Buechele, A.C., Lai, S.T., and Pegg, I.L., “Alteration Phases on High-Sodium Waste Glasses After Short- and Long-Term Hydration,” Ceramic Transactions, 107, 251 (2000).Google Scholar
11. Chandrasekhar, S., “Stochastic Problems in Physics and Astronomy,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 15, 189 (1943).Google Scholar
12. Aertsens, M. and Iseghem, P. Van, “Modelling Glass Dissolution with a Monte Carlo Technique,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 412, 271278 (1996).Google Scholar
13. Aertsens, M., “Testing the Grambow Glass Dissolution Model by Comparing It with Monte Carlo Simulations Results,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 556, 409419 (1999).Google Scholar