Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T19:17:27.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanical Stress and Process Integration of Direct X-ray Detector and TFT in a-Si:H Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Czang-Ho Lee ,
Isaac Chan  and
Arokia Nathan
Czang-Ho Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada
Isaac Chan
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada
Arokia Nathan
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada
Get access

Abstract

This paper presents an alternate strategy to reduce the mechanical stress issues pertinent to the process integration of molybdenum/hydrogenated amorphous silicon (Mo/a-Si:H) Schottky diodes and thin film transistors (TFTs), used as X-ray sensor pixels for medical imaging. The previous approach was to minimize the intrinsic stress in the Mo layer through appropriate process conditions and film thickness, but over narrow process latitude and with a compromise in X-ray sensitivity. Alternatively, the mechanical stress in Mo can be reduced by reducing and/or avoiding the extrinsic stress exerted on Mo by the underlying films through a different masking sequence in the fabrication. This modified process allows for a more flexible design of the Mo layer for enhanced X-ray sensitivity, while maintaining the mechanical integrity of the various layers. Also, the performance of the Schottky diode is improved, in terms of its forward current. The pixel shows good linearity in the X-ray response over the range of 40 ∼ 100 kVp.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 762: Symposium A – Amorphous and Nanocrystalline Silicon-Based Films – 2003 , 2003 , A18.12
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Street, R. A., Nelson, S., Antonuk, L. E., and Mendez, V. Perez, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 192, 441 (1990).Google Scholar
[2] Street, R. A. and Antonuk, L. E., IEEE Circuits and Devices, 38 (1993).Google Scholar
[3] Zhao, W. and Rowlands, J. A., Med. Phys. 22, 1595 (1995).Google Scholar
[4] Lee, D. L., Cheung, L. K., and Jeromin, L. S., SPIE Proc. 2432, 237 (1995).Google Scholar
[5] Aflatooni, K., Nathan, A., Hornsey, R., Cunningham, I. A., and Chamberlain, S. G., Technical Digest, IEEE, International Electron Devices Meeting, 197 (1997).Google Scholar
[6] Nathan, A., Hornsey, R., and Aflatooni, K., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 47, 2093 (2000).Google Scholar
[7] Park, B. and Nathan, A., ECS Proc. 98-22, 381 (1998).Google Scholar
[8] Park, B., Karim, K. S., and Nathan, A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 18, 688 (2000).Google Scholar
[9] Park, B., Murthy, R. V. R., Sazonov, A., Nathan, A., and Chamberlain, S. G., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 507, 237 (1998).Google Scholar
[10] Aflatooni, K., Hornsey, R., and Nathan, A., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 467, 925 (1997).Google Scholar