Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T10:27:25.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Luminescence of Lu2O3:Tm3+ nanoparticles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Celso de Mello Donegá
Affiliation:
Debye Institute, Dept. of Physics and Chemistry of Condensed Matter, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 1, 3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands On leave of absence from Dept. of Fundamental Chemistry, UFPE, Recife-PE, Brazil
Eugeniusz Zych
Affiliation:
Faculty of Chemistry, Wroclaw University, 14 Joliot-Curie Street, 50-383 Wroclaw, Poland
Andries Meijerink
Affiliation:
Debye Institute, Dept. of Physics and Chemistry of Condensed Matter, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 1, 3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

This paper presents for the first time a comparison between the luminescence properties (viz. emission and excitation spectra, lifetimes, and concentration quenching) of nanocrystalline and microcrystalline Lu2O3:xTm3+ (x= 0.1– 5 mol%). The results show that the most important difference between the two size regimes is the higher defect concentration in the nanoparticles. These defects give rise to a broadband emission (λmax = 430 nm), and to partial quenching of the Tm3+ emission, in addition to the expected concentration quenching by cross-relaxation between Tm3+ ions. The defect concentration seems to be similar in all nanocrystalline samples, so that those with the lowest Tm3+ concentrations experience the most pronounced quenching. The nature of these defects is as yet unknown. The local structure around the Tm3+ ions is not noticeably different in the two size regimes. No evidence of phonon confinement or quantum size effects was observed in the Tm3+luminescence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Gaponenko, S.V.; Optical Properties of Semiconductor Nanocrystals, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998).Google Scholar
2 Alivisatos, A. P., J. Phys. Chem 100, 13226 (1996).Google Scholar
3 Tissue, B.M., Chem. Mater. 10, 2837 (1998)Google Scholar
4 Schmechel, R., Kennedy, M., Seggern, H. von, Winkler, H., Kolbe, M., Fischer, R.A., Xaomao, L., Benker, A., Winterer, M., Hahn, H., J. Appl. Phys. 89, 1679 (2001).Google Scholar
5 Meltzer, R.S., Feofilov, S.P., Tissue, B.M., Yuan, H.B., Phys. Rev. B 60,R14012 (1999).Google Scholar
6 Yang, H-S., Hong, K.S., Feofilov, S.P., Tissue, B.M., Meltzer, R.S., Dennis, W.M., J. Lumin. 83&84,139 (1999).Google Scholar
7 Li, Q., Gao, L., Yan, D., Nanostruc. Mater. 8, 825 (1997).Google Scholar
8 Duan, C.-K., Yin, M., Yan, K., Reid, M. F., J. Alloys Compd. 303–304, 371 (2000).Google Scholar
9 Haase, M., Riwotzki, K., Meyssamy, H., Kornowski, A., J. Alloys Compd. 303–304, 191 (2000).Google Scholar
10 Huignard, A., Gacoin, T., Boilot, J.-P., Chem. Mater. 12, 1090 (2000).Google Scholar
11 Bhargava, R.N., Chabra, V., Kulkarni, B., Veliadis, J.V., Phys. Status Sol. B 210, 621 (1998).Google Scholar
12 Bol, A. A., Meijerink, A., Phys. Rev. B 58, 15997 (1998).Google Scholar
13 Li, C., Lagriffoul, A., Moncorge, R., Souriau, J.C., Borel, C., Wyon, Ch., J. Lumin. 62, 157 (1994).Google Scholar
14 Guyot, Y., Moncorge, R., Merkle, L.D., Pinto, A., McIntosh, B., Verdum, H., Opt. Mater. 5, 127 (1996).Google Scholar
15 Polizzi, S., Fagherazzi, G., Speghini, A., Bettinelli, M., J. Mater. Res., 15, 586 (2000).Google Scholar
16 Zych, E., Opt. Mater., 16, 445 (2001).Google Scholar
17 Henderson, B. and Imbusch, G.F., Optical Spectroscopy of Inorganic Solids, (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989).Google Scholar