Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T12:20:47.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Limiting Factors of Backside External Gettering by Nanocavities and Aluminum-Silicon Alloying in Silicon Wafers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

N. Gay Henquinet
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Photoélectricité, EA 2192 LP-DSO “Défauts dans les Semi-conducteurs et les Oxydes”, University of Marseilles, F 13397 Marseille Cedex 20santo.martinuzzi@dso.u-3mrs.fr
S. Martinuzzi
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Photoélectricité, EA 2192 LP-DSO “Défauts dans les Semi-conducteurs et les Oxydes”, University of Marseilles, F 13397 Marseille Cedex 20santo.martinuzzi@dso.u-3mrs.fr
Get access

Abstract

Float zone silicon single crystalline wafers are submitted to He ion implantations at various energy levels and fluences in the ranges 40 to 120 keV and 1016 to 1017 cm−2, respectively. Cavities are formed after annealing at 900°C for 1 h in argon. Al-Si gettering results from the deposition of a backside 1 µm thick Al wafer and annealing at 900'C for 4 h in argon. The wafers are voluntarily contaminated by 1014 to 1017 cm−3nickel atoms and diffusion length of minority carriers is determined by SPV technique and measured before and after gettering.

It is found that gettering by cavities works fairly well provided the fluence is 1017 cm−2. The gettering efficiency decreases in heavily contaminated samples suggesting that the capture of impurities by the cavities is limited by the saturation of their internal surface. Al-Si alloying appears more efficient at higher contamination levels. This is most likely due to the high solubility of metal atoms in the liquid Al-Si alloy formed during the annealing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Martinuzzi, S., in Polycrystalline Semiconductors, ed. by Werner, J., Strunk, H. and Miller, H.J., (Springer 35, 1989) p.148.Google Scholar
[2] Shimura, F., in Semiconductor Silicon Crystal Technology, Academic Press, San Diego, (1988), p.344.Google Scholar
[3] Schroter, W., Seibt, M. and Gilles, D., Material Science and Technology, 4, 540 (1992).Google Scholar
[4] Apel, M., Hanke, J., Schindler, R. and Schroter, W., J. Appl. Phys., 76, 4432 (1994).Google Scholar
[5] Weber, E.R., Me Hugo, S.A. and Hielsmair, H., Solid State Phenomena, 47–48, 165 (1995).Google Scholar
[6] Martinuzzi, S., Périchaud, I. and Simon, J.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 2744 (1997).Google Scholar
[7] Myers, S.M., Follstaedt, D.M., Bishop, D.M. and Madernach, J.W., Semiconductor Silicon 1994, ed. by Huff, H.R., Bergholz, W. and Sumino, K., (The Electrochemical Society, Pennington N.J., 1994) p.808.Google Scholar
[8] Myers, S.M. and Follstaedt, D.M., J. Appl. Phys., 79 1337 (1995).Google Scholar
[9] Raineri, V., Fallica, P.G., Pecolla, G., Battaglia, A., Barbagallo, M. and Campisano, S.U., J. Appl. Phys. 78, 3727 (1995).Google Scholar
[10] Gay, N. and Martinuzzi, S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 19, 2568 (1997).Google Scholar
[11] Martinuzzi, S. and Stemmer, M., Mat. Science Engineering B 24, 152 (1994).Google Scholar
[12] Stemmer, M., Véve, C., Gay, N. and Martinuzzi, S., Mat. Science and Technology 11, 703 (1995).Google Scholar
[13] Gay, N. and Martinuzzi, S., Solid State Phenomena 57–58, 115 (1997).Google Scholar
[14] Follstaedt, D.M., Myers, S.M., Peterson, G.A. and Medernach, J.D., J. Electron. Mater. 25, 151 (1996).Google Scholar