Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:54:57.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lifetime Characterization of Poly-Silicon Back Sealed Wafers with Bi-Surface Photoconductivity Decay Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Y. Ogita
Affiliation:
Kanagawa Institute of Technology, Atsugi, Kanagawa, 243-02 Japan, ogita@ele.kanagawait.ac.jp
Y. Uematsu
Affiliation:
Kanagawa Institute of Technology, Atsugi, Kanagawa, 243-02 Japan, ogita@ele.kanagawait.ac.jp
H. Daio
Affiliation:
Silicon R & D Center, Showa Denko K.K., Chichibu, Saitama, 369-18 Japan, daio@ccf.sdk.co.jp
Get access

Abstract

Bi-surface photoconductivity decay (BSPCD) method has been useful to obtain the true bulk lifetime and surface recombination velocities in silicon wafers with variously finished surfaces. Thermally oxidized n-type CZ silicon wafers with and without a poly-Si back seal (PBS) were characterized with the BSPCD method using 500 MHz-UHF wave reflection. It has been found that the surface recombination velocity of the PBS surface is, 4027 cm/s while that of the no-PBS surface is 16 cm/s, for example. The very fast surface recombination velocity is attributed to the poly-Si / Si interface character. Moreover, the bulk lifetime calculated in the PBS wafer is much higher than that in the no-PBS one, which reveals the PBS gettering performance for the thermal oxidation induced contamination.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Daio, H., Yakushiji, K., Buczkowski, A. and Shimura, F., Materials Science Forum 196–201, p.1817, (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Horanyi, T.S., Pavelka, T. and Tutto, P., Applied Surface Science 63, p.306 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Usami, A., Jintate, S. and Kudo, B., Oyo Buturi 49, p.1192 (1980) [in Japanese].Google Scholar
4. Buczkowski, A., Radzimski, Z.J., Rozgonyi, G.A. and Shimura, F., J. Appl. Phys. 72, p.2873 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Ikeda, N., Buczkowski, A. and Shimura, F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, p. 2914 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Ogita, Y., J. Appl. Phys. 79, p.6954 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Daio, H., Ohkawa, S., Nagayama, H. and Yakushiji, K., Extended Abstracts of the 55th Applied Physics Society Autumn Meeting (The Japan Society of Applied Physics), 22a-ZE-4 (1994) [in Japanese].Google Scholar
8. Correia, A., Ballutaud, D. and Maurice, J.L., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33, p. 1217 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar