Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T12:26:11.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Kinetics of Electromigration Damage in Copper Films Studied by Isothermal Resistance Change Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

C. W. Park
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Solid State Science and Technology, Physics Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-1130
R. W. Vook
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Solid State Science and Technology, Physics Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-1130
Get access

Abstract

Electromigration damage is one of the primary causes of the failure of interconnects in VLSI circuits. In this work, the response of Cu films to electromigration stress has been studied by an isothermal electrical resistance method. Accurate temperature measurement and control of Cu stripes stressed at elevated temperatures and high current densities were accomplished by use of a thin film thermistor. The activation energy and current density exponent were measured for vacuum evaporated Cu films and the values that were obtained are 0.79±0.02eV and 3.6±0.2, respectively. Scanning electron micrographs of stripes that underwent electromigration damage showed many voids in the cathode region, hillocks in the anode region, and both voids and hillocks in the rest of the stripe. The activation energies of two aluminum stripes were also measured by the same method. An average value of 0.54±0.02eV was obtained.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pai, P.L. and Ting, C.H., ”Copper as the future interconnection material,” in Proc. IEEE VLSI Multilevel Interconnection Conf.(Santa Clara,CA), June 1989, p. 258.Google Scholar
2. Pai, P.L. and Ting, C.H., IEEE Device Lett. 10, 423 (1989).Google Scholar
3. d'Heurle, F.M. and Ho, P.S., Thin Films:Interdiffusion and Reactions (Poate, J.M., Tu, K.N. and Mayer, J.W.), John Wiley, New York, 243 (1978).Google Scholar
4. Kwok, T., Chan, K.K., Chan, H. and Simko, J., to appear in J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A, July/August(1991).Google Scholar
5. Schreiber, H.U., Solid State Electron. 24, 583 (1981).Google Scholar
6. Blech, I.A., J.Appl.Phys. 47, 1203 (1976).Google Scholar
7. Sato, K., Chang, C.Y., Patrinos, A., Vook, R.W. and Schwarz, J.A., Vacuum 41, 1229 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Ghate, P.B., Ann. Proc. Reliab. Phys. Symp., 20, 292 (1982)Google Scholar
9. d'Heurle, F.M. and Gangulee, A., Thin Solid Films 25, 531 (1975).Google Scholar
10. Rosenberg, R. and Berenbaum, L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 12, 201 (1968).Google Scholar
11. Hummel, R.E., Dehoff, R.T. and Geier, H.J., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 37, 73 (1976).Google Scholar
12. Park, C.W. and Vook, R.W., Appl. Phys. Lett.(July 8, 1991).Google Scholar