Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-21T22:10:45.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kinetics of Copper Grain Growth During Nitridation of Cu-Cr and Cu-Ti Thin Films by In Situ Tem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Z. Atzmon
Affiliation:
Center for Solid State Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287
R. Sharma
Affiliation:
Center for Solid State Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287
S. W. Russell
Affiliation:
Center for Solid State Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287
J.W. Mayer
Affiliation:
Center for Solid State Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287
Get access

Abstract

Co-deposited Cu-Cr and Cu-Ti thin films were heated at various temperatures in an ammonia ambient in an environmental cell placed into the column of a transmission electron microscope (TEM). The reaction dynamics were observed in situ and recorded on a videotape using a TV camera with 1/30 second time resolution. Nitridation of chromium and titanium was accompanied by the nucleation and growth of copper particles starting at 370 and 580°C, respectively. It was found that in the Cu-Ti system at a temperatures regime of 370-400°C the growth rate behaves under a parabolic law; namely, the process is controlled by diffusion of Cu through the nitride matrix. However, for the Cu-Cr system at temperatures of 610-630°C two growth regimes were observed. In the initial growth stages, the surface reaction is rate-limiting, while for longer nitridation times, growth is diffusion-controlled.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Ho, P. S., in Principles of Electronic Packaging, edited by Seraphim, D. P., Lasky, R. and Li, C. Y. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1989), p. 809.Google Scholar
2 Li, J., Shacham-Diamand, Y. and Mayer, J. W., Materials Science Report 9, 1 (1992).Google Scholar
3 McBrayer, J. D., Swanson, R. M. and Sigmon, T. W., J. Electrochem. Soc. 133, 1242 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Li, J., Mayer, J. W., Shacham-Diamand, Y. and Colgan, E. G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 2983 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Holloway, K., Fryer, P. M., Cabral, C. Jr., Harper, J. M. E., Bailey, P. J. and Kelleher, K. H., J. Appl. Phys. 71, 5433 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Reid, J. S., Kolawa, E. and Ruiz, R. P., Thin Solid Films 236, 319 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Atzmon, Z., Sharma, R., Mayer, J. W. and Hong, S. Q., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., (1993).Google Scholar
8 Sharma, R., Atzmon, Z., Mayer, J. W. and Hong, S. Q., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., (1993).Google Scholar