Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T19:19:14.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ion-Implantation Getiering of Impurities in CdTe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

M. H. Jin
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
K. M. James
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
C. E. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
J. L. Merz
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Get access

Abstract

This is the first reported use of ion-implantation damage gettering of impurities in CdTe to provide high-quality substrates for the epitaxial growth of appropriate binary or ternary compounds, or for related applications. We describe the results of photoluminescence (PL) measurements performed on samples of Bridgeman-grown CdTe to study both the annealing behavior and gettering effects in this material. From the PL results, it was found that impurity gettering occurs at temperatures at which liquid phase epitaxy take place (∼500°C) so that these two fabrication procedures are compatible. It was also found that the optimum anneal time at this temperature is four hours.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Impurity Diffusion and Gettering in Silicon, MRS Symposia Proceedings, Vol. 36. Edited by Fair, Richard B., Pearce, Charles W. and Washburn, Jack.(Boston, Massachusetts, 1984).Google Scholar
2. Seidel, T.E. and Meek, R.L., Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Ion Implantation in Semiconductors and Other Materials, edited by Crowder, B. L. (Plenum, New York, 1973), p. 305.Google Scholar
3. Bozler, C. O., Donnelly, J. P., Lindley, W. T. and Reynolds, R. A.. “Impurity Gettering in Semi-Insulating Gallium Arsenide Using Ion-Implantation Damage.” Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 29, No. 11, (1 Dec. 1976).Google Scholar
4. Nobel, D. E., Philips Res. Rep. 14, 361 (1959).Google Scholar
5. Molva, E., Chamonal, J. P. and Pautrat, J. L.Shallow Acceptors in Cadmium TelluridePhys. Stat. Sol. (b) 109, 635 (1982).Google Scholar
6. Hovel, H. J. and Guidotti, D.. “Correlations of Photoluminescence with Defect Densities in Semi-Insulating GaAs.” IEEE Transaction on Electron Devices, Vol. ED–32, No. 11 Nov.,198DGoogle Scholar
7. Petroff, P. M., Logan, R. A. and Savage, A.. “Nonradiative Recombination at dislocations in III-V Compound Semiconductors.” Phys. rev. let. Vol. 44, No. 4, 28 Jan., 1980 Google Scholar
8. Cirlin, E. H.. Intl. Conference on II-VI Compounds, Monterey, CA 1987.Google Scholar
9. Figueroa, Juan M., Sanchez-Sinencio, F., etc. “Influence of CdTe Vacancies on the Photoluminescence of CdTe.” J. Appl. Phys. 60 (1), 1 July, 1986.Google Scholar