Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-21T07:39:08.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ion Milling Damage in InP and GaAs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

S. J. Pearton
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
U. K. Chakrabarti
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
A. P. Perley
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
Get access

Abstract

Near-surface damage created by Ar+ ion milling in InP and GaAs was characterized by capacitance-voltage, current-voltage, photoluminescence, ion channeling and transmission electron microscopy. We find no evidence of amorphous layer formation in either material even for Ar+ ion energies of 800eV. Low ion energies (200eV) create thin (≤100 Å) damaged regions which can be removed by annealing at 500°C. Higher ion energies (≤500 eV) create more thermally stable damaged layers which actually show higher backscattering yields after 500°C annealing. Heating to 800°C is required to restore the near-surface crystallinity, although a layer of extended defects forms in GaAs after such a treatment. No dislocations are observed in InP after this type of annealing. The electrical characteristics of both InP and GaAs after ion milling at ≥500 eV cannot be restored by annealing, and it is necessary to remove the damaged surface by wet chemical etching. For the same Ar+ ion energies the damaged layers are deeper for InP than for GaAs-after 500 eV ion milling at 45° incidence angle, removal of ∼485 Å and ∼650 Å from GaAs and InP respectively restores the initial current-voltage charaeteristics of simple Schottky diodes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. See for example, Ashbey, C. I. H., EMIS Data Review, RN 15422, December 1985.Google Scholar
2. Kawabe, M., Kanzaki, N., Masuda, K. and Namba, S., Appl. Opt. 17, 2556 (1978).Google Scholar
3. Pang, S. W. and Piancentini, W. J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B1, 1334 (1983).Google Scholar
4. Yuba, Y., Ishida, T., Gamo, K. and Namba, S., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B6, 253 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Cole, E. D., Sen, S. and Burton, L. C., J. Electron Mater. 18, 527 (1989).Google Scholar
6. Smith, P. J. and Allan, D. A., Vacuum 34, 209 (1984).Google Scholar
7. Kwan, P., Bhat, K. N., Borrego, J. M. and Ghandi, S. K., Solid State Electron. 26, 125 (1983).Google Scholar
8. Wang, Y. G. and Ashok, S., Nucl. Inst. Meth. in Physics Research, B39, 461 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Zalm, P. C., Vacuum 36, 787 (1986).Google Scholar