Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:50:28.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ion Beam-Induced Changes in Optical Properties of MgO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Ying Qian
Affiliation:
Center for Irradiation of Materials
D. Ila
Affiliation:
Center for Irradiation of Materials
K. X. He
Affiliation:
Center for Nonlinear Optics, Alabama A&M University, Normal, Alabama 35762–1447
M. Curley
Affiliation:
Center for Nonlinear Optics, Alabama A&M University, Normal, Alabama 35762–1447
D. B. Poker
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831–6057
L. A. Boatner
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831–6057
Get access

Abstract

The implantation of Ag into MgO (100) single crystals, followed by thermal annealing at 1100°C, leads to dramatic changes in their optical properties. The changes in the optical properties are due to the presence of small Ag clusters which are formed in the annealed samples. The small Ag clusters are obtained by thermal annealing of the implanted MgO crystals between 600°C and 1100°C to investigate the changes in cluster sizes and to correlate with changes in their optical properties. Sample characterization is carried out using optical spectrophotometry to confirm the effective presence of Ag clusters and Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry (RBS) to study the profile of Ag clusters.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

1 Ion Beam Modification of Insulators, (ed. by Paolo Mazzoldi and George Arnold, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987).Google Scholar
2 Townsend, P. D., Rep. Prog. Phys. 50, 501 (1987).Google Scholar
3 Mie, G., Ann. Physik 25, 377 (1908).Google Scholar
4 Doyle, W. T., Phys. Rev. 111, 1067 (1958).Google Scholar
5 Hughs, A. E. and Jian, S. C., Adv. Phys. 28, 717 (1979).Google Scholar
6 Abouchacra, G. and Serughetti, J., Nucl. Instr. and Methods in Phys. Res. B14 282 (1986).Google Scholar
7 Rankin, J., Thevenard, P., Boatner, L. A., White, C. W. and McHargue, C. J., Surface and Coating Technology, 51 471 (1992).Google Scholar
8 Fuchs, G., Abouchacra, G., Treilleux, M., Thevenard, P., and Serughetti, J., Nucl. Instr. and Methods in Phys. Res. B32, 100 (1988).Google Scholar
9 Abouchacra, G., Chassagne, G., and Serughetti, J., Radiation Effects 64, 189 (1982).Google Scholar
10 Ziegler, J. F., Biersack, J. P. and Littmark, U., The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids (Pergamon Press Inc., New York, 1985).Google Scholar
11 Arnold, G. W., J. Appl. Phys. 46, 4466 (1975).Google Scholar
12 Arnold, G. W. and Borders, J. A., J. Appl. Phys. 48, 1488 (1977).Google Scholar
13 White, C. W., Thomas, D. K., Zuhr, R. A., McCallum, J. C., Pogany, A., Haglund, R. F., Magruder, R. H. and Yang, L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 268. 331, (1992)Google Scholar
14 Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 68 edition, (ed. by R. C. Weast, CRC press, Inc., Boca Raton, Florida, 1987).Google Scholar
15 Henderson, Brian, Radiation Effects 64, 3547 (1982).Google Scholar