Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T09:57:15.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ion Beam Assisted Square Spiral Photonic Crystal Fabrication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Jason Sorge
Affiliation:
jsorge@ualberta.ca, Univeristy of Alberta, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2nd Floor, Electrical and Computer Engineering Research Facility, Univeristy of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2V4, Canada
Mark Summers
Affiliation:
msummers@ece.ualberta.ca, University of Alberta, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Edmonton, T6G 2V4, Canada
Michael Fleischauer
Affiliation:
mfleisch@ece.ualberta.ca, University of Alberta, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Edmonton, T6G 2V4, Canada
Kyrylo Tabunshchyk
Affiliation:
tkir@ece.ualberta.ca, National Institute for Nanotechnology, Edmonton, T6G 2M9, Canada
Andriy Kovalenko
Affiliation:
andriy.kovalenko@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca, National Institute for Nanotechnology, Edmonton, T6G 2M9, Canada
Michael Brett
Affiliation:
brett@ece.ualberta.ca, University of Alberta, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Edmonton, T6G 2V4, Canada
Get access

Abstract

Photonic crystals currently hold exciting potential in waveguiding applications with the ability to greatly reduce waveguide bend radii, allowing for the realization of photonic networks with increased complexity and device density. Square spiral photonic crystals are comprised of periodic arrays of slanted cylindrical columns with periodic abrupt 90° changes in the column growth direction. The abrupt changes produce elbows which correspond to points in the three-dimensional diamond lattice, which are commonly referred to as diamond:n photonic crystal structures based on the nth nearest neighbor lattice point between column arms. The diamond:n structures are characterized by four parameters: column separation, spiral pitch, column diameter, and column growth angle. These structures have been shown theoretically to have a three-dimensional relative bandgap of approximately 15% for a direct silicon diamond:1 structure and approximately 24% for an inverse silicon diamond:5 structure with circular column cross sections. Silicon square spiral photonic crystals can be grown by a single-step thin film deposition process known as glancing angle deposition (GLAD), which utilizes rotation of lithographically patterned substrates and advanced control algorithms. While using GLAD to grow square spiral photonic crystals in a single-step process is desirable, it does have inherent limitations. Physical vapor deposited films deposited at oblique incidence angles form columns with angle ≤ 60° relative to the substrate normal. This deviates from the optimal diamond:1 and diamond:5 structures which require film growth angles of approximately 64° and 74°, respectively. Here we present SEM images of periodic silicon square spiral films grown with a vapor source incidence angle of 85° that indicate an average column tilt angle of 57˚ for films grown with the basic GLAD process and an average column tilt angle between 61˚ and 65˚ using an ion-assisted GLAD process. Photonic simulations indicating that square spiral films with complete three-dimensional photonic bandgaps are only achievable via ion-assisted GLAD are also presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Toader, O., and John, S., Phys. Rev. E, 66, 016610 (2002)Google Scholar
2. Harris, K.D., Huizinga, A., and Brett, M.J., Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 5, H27 (2002)Google Scholar
3. Steele, J.J., Popta, A.C. van, Hawkeye, M.M., Sit, J.C., and Brett, M.J., Sensors and Acuators B, 120, 213 (2006)Google Scholar
4. Harris, K.D., Vick, D., Gonzales, E.J., Smy, T., Robbie, K, and Brett, M.J., Surface and Coatings Technol., 138, 185 (2001)Google Scholar
5. Popta, A.C. van, Hawkeye, M.H., Sit, J.C., and Brett, M.J., Opt. Lett., 29, 2545 (2004)Google Scholar
6. Kaminska, K., Brown, T., Beydaghyan, G., and Robbie, K., Appl. Opt., 42, 4212 (2003)Google Scholar
7. Kennedy, S.R., and Brett, M.J., Appl. Opt., 42, 4573 (2003)Google Scholar
8. Kennedy, S.R., Brett, M.J., Toader, O., and John, S., Nano Lett., 2, 59 (2002)Google Scholar
9. Kennedy, S.R., Brett, M.J., Miguez, H., Toader, O., and John, S., Photonics and Nanostructures, 1, 37 (2003)Google Scholar
10. Toader, O., and John, S., Science, 292, 1133 (2001)Google Scholar
11. Jensen, M., and Brett, M., Optics Express, 13, 3348 (2005)Google Scholar
12. Fleischauer, M.D., Sorge, J.B., Joseph, R.A., and Brett, M.J., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 960, 0960-N01-03 (2007)Google Scholar
13. Hodgkinson, I., and Wu, Q.H., Mod. Phys. Lett. B, 15, 1328 (2001)Google Scholar
14. Jensen, M.O., and Brett, M.J., Appl. Phys. A, 80, 763 (2005)Google Scholar
15. Kennedy, S.R., and Brett, M.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 22, 1184 (2004)Google Scholar
16. Johnson, S.G., and Joannopoulos, J.D, Optics Express, 8, 173 (2001)Google Scholar