Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T00:16:11.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigation of Bi-Exciton Formation in Doped GaAsAlxGa(1-x)as Quantum Wells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

CI. Harris
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Measurement Technology, University of Linköping, S-58183 Linköping, Sweden.
B. Monemar
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Measurement Technology, University of Linköping, S-58183 Linköping, Sweden.
P.O. Holtz
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Measurement Technology, University of Linköping, S-58183 Linköping, Sweden.
M. Sundaram
Affiliation:
Center for Studies of Quantized Electronic Structures (QUEST), University of California at Santa Barbara, CA 93016, USA
J.L. Merz
Affiliation:
Center for Studies of Quantized Electronic Structures (QUEST), University of California at Santa Barbara, CA 93016, USA
A.C. Gossard
Affiliation:
Center for Studies of Quantized Electronic Structures (QUEST), University of California at Santa Barbara, CA 93016, USA
Get access

Abstract

A number of recent studies of GaAs/AlxGa(1-x)As quantum wells using low temperature photoluminescence have demonstrated the formation of bi-excitons. It is generally assumed that bi-excitons will only be formed in samples with low impurity concentration, we demonstrate in this work that bi-excitons can be observed in 150 Å quantum well samples with an acceptor doping density as high as 3x1017 cm-3. We discuss how bi-exciton formation is limited by impurity capture and show how this influence can partly account for the less than quadratic intensity dependence typically observed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Reynolds, D.C., K.K, Bajaj, Stutz, CE., Jones, R.L., Theis, W.M., Yu, P.W. and Evans, K.R., Phys. Rev. B 40,3340 (1989)Google Scholar
2 Cingolani, R., Ploog, K., Peter, G., Hahn, R., Göbel, E. O., Moro, C . and Cingolani, A., Phys. Rev. B 41, 3272 (1990)Google Scholar
3 Charbonneau, S., Steiner, T., Thewalt, M.L.W., Koteles, E.S., Chi, J.Y. and Elman, B., Phys. Rev. B 38,3583 (1988)Google Scholar
4 Philips, R.T., Lovering, D.J., Denton, G.J. and Smith, G.W., Phys. Rev. B 45, 4308 (1992)Google Scholar
5 Kleinman, D.A. Phys. Rev B 28, 871 (1983)Google Scholar
6 Harris, C.I., Monemar, B., Kalt, H., Holtz, P.O., Sundaram, M., Merz, J.L. and Gossard, A.C., manuscript.Google Scholar
7 Harris, CI., Monemar, B., Holtz, P.O., Kalt, H., Sundaram, M., Merz, J.L. and Gossard, A.C., to appear in Proceedings of International Conference on Optical properties of Excitons in Confined Systems, Montpellier (1993)Google Scholar
8 Ulbrich, R.G., Solid State Electronics 21, 51 (1978)Google Scholar
9 Harris, C.I., Monemar, B., Kalt, H., Holtz, P.O., Sundaram, M., Merz, J.L. and Gossard, A.C., unpublishedGoogle Scholar