Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T23:51:44.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Internal Field Distribution in Organic Light Emitting Diodes with Double Layer Structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

C. Hochfilzer ,
T. Jost ,
A. Niko ,
W. Graupner ,
G. Leising ,
C. W. Tang ,
E. Forsythe  and
Y. Gao
C. Hochfilzer
Affiliation:
Institute for Solid State Physics, University of Technology Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria
T. Jost
Affiliation:
Institute for Solid State Physics, University of Technology Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria
A. Niko
Affiliation:
Institute for Solid State Physics, University of Technology Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria
W. Graupner
Affiliation:
Institute for Solid State Physics, University of Technology Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria
G. Leising
Affiliation:
Institute for Solid State Physics, University of Technology Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria
C. W. Tang
Affiliation:
Imaging Research and Advanced Development, Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY 14650
E. Forsythe
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, NY14627
Y. Gao
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, NY14627
Get access

Abstract

Double layer organic light emitting devices (OLED) are constructed by evaporating tris(8 -hydroxy) quinoline aluminum (Alq3) on a spin cast thin film of a methyl substituted ladder type poly -para -phenylene (m -LPPP). A thick layer of Mg:Ag is used as the cathode material. These organic materials are very suitable for application in OLEDs both, as transporting materials as well as active layers. Alq3 predominantly transports electrons while m - LPPP is a conjugated polymer having higher hole mobilities. Due to these transport properties the formation and radiative recombination of the excitons in ITO/m -LPPP/Alq3/Mg:Ag devices occur close to the m -LPPP/Alq3 interface. We compare the device performance of OLEDs with varying Alq3 layer thickness (0, 50, 150, 300, 500Å) and constant m -LPPP layer thickness (900Å). A difference in the device parameters and performance as a function of the Alq3 layer thickness is observed. We analyze these results with respect to the internal electric field distribution of the double layer devices derived from electroabsorption measurements.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 488: Symposium J – Electrical, Optical & Magnetic Properties of Organic IV , 1997 , 121
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Tang, C. W., VanSlyke, S. A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 913 (1987)Google Scholar
2. Tang, C. W., VanSlyke, S. A., Chen, C. H., J. Appl. Phys. 65, 3610 (1989)Google Scholar
3. Tasch, S., Brandstätter, C., Meghdadi, F., Leising, G., Froyer, G., Athouel, L., Adv. Mater. 9, 33 (1997)Google Scholar
4. Tang, C.W., Williams, D.J., Chang, J. C., US-Patent 5,294,870, (1994)Google Scholar
5. Burroughes, J. H., Bradley, D. D. C., Brown, A. R., Marks, R. N., Mackay, K., Friend, R. H., Burn, P. L. Kraft, A., Holmes, A. B., Nature 347, 530 (1990)Google Scholar
6. Grem, G., Leditzky, G., Ullrich, B., Leising, G., Adv. Mater. 4, 36 (1992)Google Scholar
7. Tasch, S., Niko, A., Leising, G., Scherf, U., Appi. Phys. Lett. 68, 1090 (1996).Google Scholar
8. Scherf, U., Bohnen, A., Müllen, K., Makromol. Chem. 193, p. 1127 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Freeman, D. C., White, C. E., J. A. Chem. Soc. 78, p. 2,68 (1956)Google Scholar
10. Hochfilzer, C., Leising, G., Forstythe, E., Gao, Y., Tang, C. W., submitted to Appl. Phys. Lett.Google Scholar
11. Meinhardt, G., Horvath, A., Weiser, G., Leising, G., Synth. Met. 84, p. 669 (1997).Google Scholar
12. Garbuzov, D. Z., Bulovic, V., Burrrows, P. E., Forrest, S. R., Chem. Phys. Lett. 249, 433 (1996).Google Scholar
13. Aspnes, D. E., Rowe, J. E., Phys. Rev. B 5, p. 4022 (1972)Google Scholar
14. Campbell, I. H., Joswick, M. D., Parker, I. D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, p. 3171 (1995)Google Scholar
15. Niko, A., Hochfilzer, C., Jost, T., Meghdadi, F., Graupner, W., Leising, G., this proceedingsGoogle Scholar