Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T20:29:27.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interfacial Reactions in Metal-Matrix Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

J. R. Heffelfinger
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, 421 Washington Ave. S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455;
R. R. Kieschke
Affiliation:
3M Industrial and Consumer Sector, 3M Center Bldg. 60–1N-01, St. Paul, MN 55144–1000
C. B. Carter
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, 421 Washington Ave. S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455;
Get access

Abstract

The interfacial reaction between Al2O3 (alumina) and a β-Ti alloy has been characterized by transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and X-ray energy-dispersive spectroscopy. Diffusion bonding single-crystal alumina and a β-Ti alloy was found to produce three interfacial regions: a region of intermetallics (Tl3Al and TiAl) located near the alumina interface, an α-Ti region, and a β-Ti region (rich in Mo, the β-phase stabilizer). Of the intermetallics to form, Ti3Al was found to form first and have an aligned, planar interface with the alumina. TiAl formed second and was found to separate grains of Ti3Al and the alumina. Reaction products observed in the diffusion-bonded alumina/β-Ti couples are compared with those observed in metal-matrix composites (MMCs), where a β-Ti alloy matrix is reinforced with alumina fibers. Different coatings used in MMCs are investigated for their ability to prevent the reaction between the matrix and fibers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Wadsworth, J. and Frees, F. H., JOM, 41, 1219 (1989).Google Scholar
2 Lu, Y., Sass, S. L., Bai, Q., Kohlstedt, D. L. and Gerberich, W. W., Acta Metall. Mater. 43, 3141 (1995).Google Scholar
3 Wang, H.-F., Nelson, J. C., Lin, C.-L. and Gerberich, W. W., J. Mater. Res. 9, 498503 (1994).Google Scholar
4 Kang, S. and Selverian, J. H., J. Mater. Sci. 27, 45364544 (1992).Google Scholar
5 Kelkar, G. P. and Carim, A. H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78, 572576 (1995).Google Scholar
6 Li, X. L., Hillel, R., Teyssandier, F., Choi, S. K. and Loo, F. J. J. V., Acta Metall. Mater. 40, 31493157 (1992).Google Scholar
7 Lu, H., Bao, C. L., Shen, D. H., Zhang, X. J., Cui, Y. D. and Lin, Z. D., J. Mater. Sci. 30, 339346 (1995).Google Scholar
8 Misra, A. K., Met. Trans. A 22A, 715721 (1991).Google Scholar
9 Selverian, J. H., Ohuchi, F. S., Bortz, M. and Notis, M. R., J. Mater. Sci. 26, 63006308 (1991).Google Scholar
10 Tressler, R. E., Moore, T. L. and Crane, R. L., J. Mater. Sci. 8, 151 (1973).Google Scholar
11 Zhang, M. X., Hsieh, K. C., Dekock, J. and Chang, Y. A., Scr. Metall. Mater. 27, 13611366 (1992).Google Scholar
12 Susnitzky, D. W. and Carter, C. B., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 69, C217220 (1986).Google Scholar
13 Chang, Y. A., Kieschke, R., DeKock, J. and Zhang, M. X., Acta Metall. Mater, in press.Google Scholar
14 McCullough, C. and Kieschke, R. R., in Intermetallic Matrix Composites III, edited by Graves, J. A., Bowman, R. R., and Lewandowski, J. J. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 350, 1994) pp. 119124.Google Scholar