Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T00:37:14.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interfacial Bonding Mechanisms in Carbon Fiber/Pmr-15 Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

A. M Serrano
Affiliation:
The University of Akron, Institute of Polymer Science, Akron, OH 44325.
I. Jangchud
Affiliation:
The University of Akron, Institute of Polymer Science, Akron, OH 44325.
R. K. Eby
Affiliation:
The University of Akron, Institute of Polymer Science, Akron, OH 44325.
K. J. Bowles
Affiliation:
NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH 44135.
D. T. Jayne
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cleveland, OH 44106.
Get access

Abstract

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), tensiometric wetting, and atomic force microscopy (AFM) were used to investigate the surfaces of PAN based carbon fibers. Percent weighted dipole moments (%WDM) were computed from the deconvoluted core level carbon XPS peaks. Tensiometric wetting separated the polar and dispersive components of the fiber surface energies thus allowing the computation of % polar energies. AFM provided quantitative measurements of the fiber surface rugosities. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed adhesive interfacial fractures for PMR-15 (polyimide) composites of fibers with low %WDM and % polar energies; cohesive fractures for those with high %WDM and % polar energies. Increasing interlaminar shear strengths correlated with increasing %WDM and % polar energies. The fibers with higher %WDM also had rougher surfaces which probably expose more graphite basal plane dipole sites in addition to providing mechanical interlocking.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bowles, K.J., SAMPE Q., 21, 6013 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Serrano, A.M., Jangchud, I., Eby, R.K. and Jayne, D.T., NASA CP 10104, 6−1 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Proctor, A. and Sherwood, P.M.A., Anal. Chem., 54, 13 (1982).Google Scholar
4. Proctor, A. and Sherwood, P.M.A., J. Electron Spectrosc., 27, 39 (1982).Google Scholar
5. Kinloch, A.J. and Kodokian, G.K.A., J. Mat. Sci. Lett., 10, 815 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Schultz, J. and Lavielle, L., Proc. 195th Natl. Am. Chem. Soc., 185 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Kaelble, D.H. and Uy, K.C., J. Adhesion, 2, 50 (1970).Google Scholar
8. Vannucci, R.D., NASA TM-82951.Google Scholar
9. Xie, Yaoming, and Sherwood, P.M.A., Chem. Mat., 1, 185 (1989).Google Scholar
10. Konkin, A.A., Properties of Carbon Fibers and Field of their Application, in Handbook of Composites, vol 1 : Strong Fibers, edited by Watt, W. and Perov, B.V., Elsevier Science New York (1985).Google Scholar