Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Interface Properties for Ceramic Composites from a Single-Fiber Pull-Out Test

  • Elizabeth P. Butler (a1), Edwin R. Fuller (a1) and Helen M. Chan (a2)

Abstract

An experimental approach has been developed using a single-fiber pullout test to measure intrinsic interface properties for ceramic composites. The properties are determined from a pull-out, force-displacement curve, which is directly related to reinforcement toughening via fiber/matrix debonding and frictional pull-out. They were evaluated for a model composite system of continuous SiC fibers with various surface treatments in a borosilicate glass matrix. For the processing conditions used, the interface fracture toughness and the interface frictional shear resistance were found to be 1.0 ± 0.5 J/m2 and 3.3 ± 0.6 MPa, respectively, for as-received fibers. Experiments conducted with long embedded fiber lengths allowed the shear resistance to be deconvolved into an interface friction coefficient of 0.05 ± 0.01 and an initial fiber-clamping pressure of 65 ± 6 MPa. Nitric acidwashed fibers gave an increased interface toughness of 3.6 ± 0.1 J/m2 and friction coefficient of 0.08 ± 0.02, but nearly the same initial clamping pressure, 72 ± 12 MPa. Calculations of the clamping pressure from the fiber/matrix thermal expansion mismatch and from stress birefringence measurements in the glass were in general agreement with this value.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1. Marshall, D.B. and Ritter, J.E., “Reliability of Advanced Structural Ceramics and Ceramic Matrix Composites, ” Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull., 66 [2], 309317 (1987).
2. Rice, J.R., “A Path Independent Integral and the Approximate Analysis of Strain Concentration by Notches and Cracks,” J. Appl. Mech., 35, 379386 (1968).
3. Broutman, L.J., “Measurement of the Fiber-Polymer Matrix Interfacial Strength,” in Interfaces in Composites, edited by Salkind, M.J., STP 452, Am. Soc. for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1969, pp. 2741.
4. Gurney, C. and Hunt, J., Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), A299, 508 (1967).
5. Stang, H. and Shah, S.P., J. Mater. Sci., 21, 953 (1986).
6. Marshall, D.B. and Oliver, W.C., “Measurement of Interfacial Mechanical Properties in Fiber Reinforced Ceramic Composites,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., Vol.70, [8], 542–48 (1987).
7. Gao, Y.-C., Mai, Y.-W. and Cotterell, B., “Fracture of Fiber-Reinforced Materials,” J. Appl. Math. and Phys. (ZAMP), 39, 550572 (1988).
8. Butler, E.P., Fuller, E.R. Jr., and Chan, H.M., to be published.
9. Vedula, M., Pangborn, R.N. and Queeney, R.A., “Fiber Anisotropic Thermal Expansion and Residual Thermal Stress in a Graphite/Aluminum Composite,” COMPOSITES, Vol.19, [1], 5560 (1988).
10. Cranmer, J.H., Tesoro, G.C., and Uhlmann, D.R., “Chemical Modification of Carbon Fiber Surfaces with Organic Polymer Coatings,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 21, 185190 (1982).
11. Photoelastic Stress Analysis, by Kuske, A. and Robertson, G., (John.Wiley & Sons, New York, 1974), pp. 111114.
12. Technical Data Sheet for Textron Silicon Carbide Fibers, TEXTRON Specialty Materials, Lowell, MA, March 1988.
13. Goettler, R.W. and Faber, K.T., “Interfacial Shear Stresses in Fiber-Reinforced Glasses,” Composites Science & Technology, (1989), in press.
14. Flemming, J.W.Optical Glasses,” in CRC Handbook of Laser Science & Technology, Volume 4: Optical Materials, Part 2, edited by Weber, M. J., CRC Press, Inc., 1986, pp. 6983.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed