Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T15:26:13.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interface Electronic And Magnetic Structures Of Layered Fe In Contact With MgO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Young Keun Kim
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Cambridge, MA 02139
Michael E. McHenry
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University, Dept. of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Manuel P. Oliveria
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Cambridge, MA 02139
Mark E. Eberhart
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Cambridge, MA 02139
Get access

Abstract

A model based on the state-of-the-art, first-principles layer Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker (LKKR) method has proven to be very effective in describing the electronic and magnetic structure of metal/ceramic interfaces. We have performed self-consistent field computations incorporating spin polarization both for Fe/MgO superlattice (bulk technique) and for MgO/Fe/MgO sandwich (layer technique) systems. Muffin-tin potentials were employed for both materials in our computations. Iron layer was embedded in MgO, the host material, to have a [110](100)Fe / [100](100)MgO contact configuration. A large enhancement of magnetic moments has been found at the interface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Falicov, L.M., Pierce, D.T., Bader, S.D., Gronsky, R., Hathaway, K.B., Hopster, H.J., Lambeth, D.N., Parkin, S.S.P., Prinz, G., Salamon, M., Ivan K., Schuller, and Victora, R.H., J. Mater. Res. 5 (6), 1299 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. McHenry, M.E., MacLaren, J.M., Eberhart, M.E., and Crampin, S., J. Magn. Magn. Mat., 88, 134(1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. McHenry, M.E. and MacLaren, J.M., Phy. Rev. B, 43, 10611 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Pirnay, J., Krey, U., and Krompiewski, S., J. Magn. Magn. Mat., 93, 267 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. MacLaren, J.M., Crampin, S., Vvendensky, D.D., Albers, R.C., and Pendry, J.B., Comp. Phys. Comm., 60, 365 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. MacLaren, J.M., Crampin, S., Vvendensky, D.D., and Pendry, J.B., Phy. Rev. B, 40, 12164(1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Nobuo, Tanaka, Masaru, Nagao, Fukio, Yoshizaki, and Kazuhiro, Mihama, J. Electron Microscopy Tech. 12, 272 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Toshio, Urano and Toru, Kanaji, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 57 (10), 3403 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Freeman, A.J., Continenza, A., and Chun, Li, MRS Bull., 15, 27 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Roger H., French, Robert V., Kasowski, Fumio S., Ohuchi, David J., Jones, Huesup, Song, and Robert L., Coble, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73 (11), 3195 (1990).Google Scholar
11. Ritcher, R., Gay, J.G., and Smith, J.R., Phys. Rev. Lett., 54, 2704 (1985).Google Scholar
12. Shinjo, T., Hine, S., and Takada, T., J. de Physique, C2, 86 (1979).Google Scholar
13. Kim, Y.K. (unpublished).Google Scholar
14. Tossell, J.A., Phy. Rev. B, 17 (2), 484 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar