Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T23:03:58.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interactions Between Carbon Nanotubes and Bacteria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Pavan M. V. Raja
Affiliation:
rajap@rpi.edu, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Chemical and Biological Engineering, CII 9015 - CIE, 110 8th Street, Troy, NY, 12180, United States
Pulickel M. Ajayan
Affiliation:
ajayan@rpi.edu, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Materials Science and Engineering, Troy, NY, 12180, United States
Omkaram Nalamasu
Affiliation:
nalamasu@rpi.edu, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Center for Integrated Electronics, Troy, NY, 12180, United States
Anurag Sharma
Affiliation:
anurag_sharma@rpi.edu, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Troy, NY, 12180, United States
Get access

Abstract

While carbon nanotubes (CNTs) possess diverse application potential ranging from polymer nanocomposites to nanostructured therapeutic devices, their environmental implications are still not well understood. In this study, we conducted experiments to monitor changes in bacterial physiology as a consequence of interactions with the CNTs. Our experiments included a common anaerobe, Escherichia coli, in an SWNT system as a model for understanding the environmental implications of CNTs. Observations over several weeks indicated that the bacteria in the presence of SWNTs showed significant morphological changes, that included elongation. It is interesting to note that similar morphological changes have been reported in response to extreme temperature and pressure, chemical agents, and quantum dots. In this presentation, the authors will present further physiological evidence, such as bacterial growth and substrate consumption rates, towards defining a possible bacteria-CNT interaction model consistent with these experimental observations, and will discuss the overall environmental implications.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ajayan, P. M., Chem. Rev. 99, pp.1787–1799 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Glasauer, S. et al, Science. 295, pp.115–119 (2002).Google Scholar
3. Lin, Y. et al, J. Nanosci. Nanotech. 6, pp.868–871 (2006).Google Scholar
4. Lee, S-H et al, W. Coll. and Surf. B: Biointerfaces. 40, pp.93–98 (2005).Google Scholar
5. Giersig, M. et al, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 845, pp.AA5.21.1 - AA5.21.6 (2005).Google Scholar
6. Grimes, P. L. et al, Appl. And Env. Microbiol. 43, pp.623–628 (1982).Google Scholar
7. Ishii, S. et al, Appl. And Env. Microbiol. 72, pp.612–621 (2006).Google Scholar
8. Bengmark, S., Gut. 42, pp.2–7 (1998).Google Scholar
9. Takeuchi, S. et al. Nano Lett. 5, pp.819–823 (2005).Google Scholar
10. Boyandin, A. N. and Popova, L. Y., Adv. in Space Res.: the official journal of COSPAR. 31, pp.1839–1845 (2003).Google Scholar
11. Brayner, R., et al. Nano Lett. 6, pp.866–870 (2006).Google Scholar
12. Lok, C. N., et al. J. Proteome Res. 5, pp.916–924 (2006).Google Scholar
13. Sharma, A., et al, Science. 295, pp.1514–1516 (2002).Google Scholar
14. Lin, Y., et al, J. Mater. Chem. 14, pp.527–541 (2004).Google Scholar
15. Raja, P. M., et al, Observations on the interactions of nanomaterials with bacteria, AGU Joint Assembly, May 2426, 2006, Baltimore, MD, USA.Google Scholar
16. Aertsen, A., et al, J. Bacteriology. 186, pp.6133–6141 (2004).Google Scholar
17. Goodell, E. W., et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 73, pp.3293–3297 (1976).Google Scholar
18. Prins, J. M., et al, Infection and Immunity, 63, pp.22362242 (1995).Google Scholar
19. Kloepfer, J. A., et al, Appl. And Env. Microbiol. 71, pp.25482557 (2005).Google Scholar