Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T03:25:11.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integration of PECVD Tungsten Nitride as a Barrier Layer for Copper Metallization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

A. R. Ivanova
Affiliation:
Genus Inc., Sunnyvale, CA 94089
C. J. Galewski
Affiliation:
Genus Inc., Sunnyvale, CA 94089
C. A. Sans
Affiliation:
Genus Inc., Sunnyvale, CA 94089
T. E. Seidel
Affiliation:
Genus Inc., Sunnyvale, CA 94089
S. Grunow
Affiliation:
New York State Center for Advanced Technology and Physics Department, the University at Albany-SUNY, Albany, NY 12222
K. Kumar
Affiliation:
New York State Center for Advanced Technology and Physics Department, the University at Albany-SUNY, Albany, NY 12222
A. E. Kaloyeros
Affiliation:
New York State Center for Advanced Technology and Physics Department, the University at Albany-SUNY, Albany, NY 12222
Get access

Abstract

Amorphous tungsten nitride (WNx) is a promising diffusion barrier for extending Cu metallization beyond 0.18 μm. This study evaluates the barrier performance, adhesion, and step coverage of PECVD WN 0.5 integrated with a CVD Cu seed layer. The WN0.5 films exhibit amorphous structure with 33% bottom and side-wall step coverage in 0.14 μm wide structures with 9:1 aspect ratio. The potential of 50 Å WN0.5 as an effective Cu barrier is shown by the absence of Secco etch-pits in the Si substrate after a 30 min anneal at 500°C. When deposited on PECVD WN0.5 the CVD Cu films exhibit uniform nucleation, and as deposited resistivity of 2.5 μΩ-cm. Step coverage of the CVD Cu is better than 95% in 0.14 μm structures. Adhesion exceeding epoxy strength of the CVD Cu seed layer even to air-exposed WN0.5 is demonstrated using stud-pull adhesion tests.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Singer, P., Semiconductor International, June 1998, p. 91 Google Scholar
2. Baglia, J., Semiconductor International, March 1997, p. 77 Google Scholar
3. Unpublished results: measured removal rate by CMP with Cu slurry for Cu, WNx, TaN, and TEOS oxide of 2100, 3300, 140, and 120 Å/min, respectively.Google Scholar
4. Results from proprietary collaboration work.Google Scholar
5. Baumann, J., Stavrev, M., Rennau, M., Raschke, T., Schulz, S., Wenzel, C., Kaufmann, C., Gessner, T., Advanced Metallization Conf. 1998, Colorado SpringsGoogle Scholar
6. Eisenbraun, E., Kelsey, J., Lane, S., Belyansky, M., Carlsen, A., Kumar, K., Anjum, D., Kaloyeros, A., Arkles, B., and Sullivan, J. in 1st International Conference on Advanced Materials and Processes for Microelectronics Proceedings (AVS, San Jose, CA, March 15–19, 1999)Google Scholar
7. Li, H., Heyvaert, I., Jin, S., Lanckmans, F., Brijs, B., Bender, H., Maex, K., and Froyen, L., Advanced Metallization Conf. 1998, Colorado SpringsGoogle Scholar
8. Jain, A., Adetutu, O., Ekstorm, B., Fiordalice, B., Venkatraman, R., and Weitzman, E., Advanced Metallization Conf. 1998, Colorado SpringsGoogle Scholar
9. Galewski, C.J., Gadgil, P.N., Matthysse, L.D., Sans, C.A., and Dharmadhikari, V.S., Conference Proceedings ULSI XII (Mater. Res. Soc. 1997), p. 277 Google Scholar
10. Park, K.C. and Kim, K.B., J. Electrochem. Soc. 142, p. 3,109 (1995)Google Scholar
11. Braeckelmann, G., Ph. D. Dissertation, University at Albany - SUNY, 1997 Google Scholar