Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:26:18.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In-Situ Control of Wafer Charge Neutralization During High Current Ion Implants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

E.N. Shauly
Affiliation:
Department of Diffusion/Ion Implantation, Tower Semiconductor, Migdal Ha'Emek, 10556, Israel Department of Materials Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 32000, Israel
E. Koltin
Affiliation:
Department of Diffusion/Ion Implantation, Tower Semiconductor, Migdal Ha'Emek, 10556, Israel
I. Munin
Affiliation:
EATON GMBH, Semiconductor Equipment, Henschelring 11, D-8011 Kirchheim, Germany.
Y. Avrahamov
Affiliation:
Department of Diffusion/Ion Implantation, Tower Semiconductor, Migdal Ha'Emek, 10556, Israel
Get access

Abstract

Ion implantation in semiconductor devices frequently leads to a substantial wafer surface charge build up. Control of this charge during high current implantation is a major process issue, as it may affect the yield and reliability of thin dielectric layers. In addition, the charge build up may affect the ion beam resulting in a non-uniform implant and a reduction in device yield. Control of a specific machine parameter, that will give the charge condition of the ion implanter will enable to neutralize the charge build up.

In this study, Disk Current Monitoring (DCM) is shown to be a reliable method for monitoring the Electron Shower (ES) performance in real time. A correlation was found between DCM level and yields, and between DCM level and breakdown voltage, as well as different maintenance activities regarding me ES. A simple 5 steps method is described to achieve a reliable, real time charge monitor, to insure operation within the “High Yield Range”.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Felch, S.B., Mehta, S., Kikuchi, S., Kitahara, S., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B55, 82 (1991).Google Scholar
2 Felch, S.B., Johnson, W.H., Keenan, W.A., Stack, A., Yarling, C.B., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B37/38, 621 (1989).Google Scholar
3 Satoh, S., Pedersen, B.O., Downey, D.F., Sakase, T., Liebert, R.B., Felch, S.B., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B55, 77 (1991).Google Scholar
4 Nee, R., Mehta, S., Felch, S.B., Kikuchi, S., Nucl. Instr. and Meth B55, 137 (1991).Google Scholar
5 Mehta, S., Outcault, R.F., McKenna, C.M., Heinonen, A., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B55, 457 (1991).Google Scholar
6 NV-10 Electron Shower 4 users guide, EATON Corp., July 1991.Google Scholar
7 Basra, V.K., McKenna, C.M., Felch, S.B., Varian report no. 101 1988.Google Scholar
8 Sinclair, F., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B55, 115 (1991).Google Scholar
9 Mack, M.E., in Ion Implantation Science and Technology, edited by Zinger, J.F. and Brown, R.I., (Academic Press, San Diego, 1988) p. 313.Google Scholar
10 Stinson, M.G., Osbum, C.M., J. Electrochem. Soc., 137 (5), 1564 (1990).Google Scholar
11 Yarling, C.B., Johnson, W.H., Keenan, W.A., Larson, L.A., Solid State Technology, 35 (3), 29 (1992).Google Scholar
12 Bhan, R.K., Basu, P.K., Chhabra, K.C., Microelectron. Reliab, 29 (4), 537 (1989).Google Scholar