Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T22:58:01.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Mechanical Rubbing of Polyhexylthiophene Layers on the Field-Effect Mobility using Differently Treated Isolator Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

H. Heil
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials and Geo Science, Darmstadt University of Technology, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
T. Finnberg
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials and Geo Science, Darmstadt University of Technology, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
R. Schmechel
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials and Geo Science, Darmstadt University of Technology, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
H. von Seggern
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials and Geo Science, Darmstadt University of Technology, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
Get access

Abstract

This paper reports on the influence of the field-effect mobility of transistors based on regioregular head-to-tail coupled poly (3-hexylthiophene) by mechanically induced alignment on differently treated insulator surfaces. It is demonstrated that on hydrophilic insulator surfaces mechanical rubbing of the polyhexylthiophene layers perpendicular to the source drain contacts can increase the field-effect mobility whereas rubbing parallel to the source drain contacts results in a reduced mobility. In contrast it is shown that in transistors with a hydrophobic insulator surfaces, which show much higher mobilities no further improvement can be achieved. The rubbing induced polymer alignment is deduced from optically polarized transmission spectroscopy on polymer-coated quartz glass substrates. The different behavior of the field-effect mobility will be explained in terms of different degrees of crystallinity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Sirringhaus, H., Tessler, N., Friend, R.H., Science 280, 1741 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Bao, Z., Dodabalapur, A., Lovinger, A.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 4108 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Sirringhaus, H., Tessler, N., Friend, R.H., Synth. Met. 102, 857 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Lin, Y.-Y., Gundlach, D.J., Jackson, T. N., IEEE Electron Device Lett. 18, 606 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Ullman, A., Ficker, J., Fix, W., Rost, H., Clemens, W., McCulloch, I., Gilles, M., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 665, C7.5.1. (2001).Google Scholar
[6] Grell, M., Bradley, D.D.C., Adv. Mater. 11, 895 (1999).3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Sirringhaus, H., Wilson, R. J., Friend, R. H., Inbasekaran, M., Wu, W., Woo, E. P., Grell, M., Bradley, D.D.C. Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 406 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Heil, H., Finnberg, T., von Malm, N., Schmechel, R., von Seggern, H., to be published in J. Appl. Phys. Feb. 2003.Google Scholar
[9] Hamaguchi, M., Yoshino, K., Polym. Adv. Technol. 8, 399, (1997).3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] McCullough, R.D., Tristram-Nagle, S., Williams, S.P., Lowe, R. D., Jayaraman, M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 4910 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar