Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-07T14:12:23.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Influence of Fiber/Matrix Interface on the Mechanical Behavior of Nicalon SiC Fiber Reinforced Glass-Ceramic Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Y. M. Liu
Affiliation:
Center for Materials Science, Mail Stop K 765, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
T. E. Mitchell
Affiliation:
Center for Materials Science, Mail Stop K 765, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
H. N. G. Wadley
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903
Get access

Abstract

The mechanical properties of unidirectional Nicalon SiC fiber reinforced calcium aluminosilicate (CAS/SiC) and magnesium aluminosilicate (MAS/SiC) glass-ceramic composites have been investigated by tensile testing and a nondestructive laser-ultrasound technique. The barium-stuffed MAS was either undoped or doped with 5% borosilicate glass. The degradation of the elastic stiffness constant Cu in the transverse direction due to interface damage was monitored in-situ by measuring the laser-generated ultrasound wave velocity. The three composite materials show distinctly different macroscopic deformation characteristics, which are correlated strongly to the interface degradation. A stronger reduction trend of the elastic constant ?? is associated with a larger degree of inelastic deformation. Observations of the fracture surfaces also reveal the close relation between fiber pullout length and interfacial characteristics. Interfaces of these composites have been studied by TEM, and their influence on inhibiting and deflecting matrix cracks is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Marshall, D. B. and Evans, A. G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 68, p. 225 (1985).Google Scholar
2 Prewo, K. M. and Brennan, J. J., J. Mater. Sci. 17, p. 2371 (1982)Google Scholar
3 Larsen, D. C. and Stuchly, S. L., in Fiber Reinforced Ceramic Composites, edited by Mazdiyasni, K. S., Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, New Jersey, p. 182221 (1990).Google Scholar
4 He, M. Y., Wu, B.-X., Evans, A. G., and Hutchinson, J. W., Mech. Mater. 18, p. 213 (1994).Google Scholar
5 Larsen, D. C., private communication.Google Scholar
6 Beryerle, D. S., Spearing, S. M., Zok, F. W., and Evans, A. G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 75, p. 2719 (1992).Google Scholar
7 Liu, Y.- M., He, Y., Chu, F., Mitchell, T. E. and Wadley, H. N. G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80, p. 142 (1997).Google Scholar
8 Brennan, J. J., in Fiber Reinforced Ceramic Composites, edited by Mazdiyasni, K. S., Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, New Jersey, p. 222–59 (1990).Google Scholar
9 Evans, A. G. and Marshall, D. B., Acta Metall. Mater. 37, p. 2567 (1989).Google Scholar
10 Liu, Y. M., Mitchell, T. E., Wadley, H. N. G., Acta Mater., accepted for publication (1997).Google Scholar
11 Dewhurst, R. J., Nurse, A. G., and Palmer, S. B., Ultrasonics, 26, p.307 (1988).Google Scholar
12 Kim, R. Y., and Pagano, N. J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, p. 1082 (1991).Google Scholar
13 Cutler, W. A., private communication (1996).Google Scholar
14 Liu, Y.M., Mitchell, T. E., and Wadley, H. N. G., unpublished work.Google Scholar
15 Liu, Y. M., Sickafus, K., Katula, P., Mitchell, T. E., and Wadley, H. N. G., unpublished work.Google Scholar