Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T01:39:05.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Influence of Capping Layer Type on Cobalt Salicide Formation in Films and Narrow Lines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

P. R. Besser
Affiliation:
Advanced Interconnect Process Development, Advanced Micro Devices, Sunnyvale, CA
A. Lauwers
Affiliation:
IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, Leuven, Belgium
N. Roelandts
Affiliation:
IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, Leuven, Belgium
K. Maex
Affiliation:
IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, Leuven, Belgium
W. Blum
Affiliation:
Materials Analysis Lab, Advanced Micro Devices, Dresden, Germany
R. Alvis
Affiliation:
Materials Analysis Lab, Advanced Micro Devices, Dresden, Germany Recently joined Digital Instruments, Santa Barbara, CA
M. Stucchi
Affiliation:
IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, Leuven, Belgium
M. De Potter
Affiliation:
IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, Leuven, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

The effect of capping layer (Ti vs TiN) on CoSi formation and CoSi2 sheet resistance has been investigated. Resistance measurements and XTEM analysis have been used to show that the Ti cap lowers the activation energy for CoSi formation by gettering the O2 from the RTA (rapid thermal anneal) ambient and eliminating the formation of SiO2 between the growing CoSi and the Co. The sheet resistance of cobalt silicide formed from Co/Ti and Co/TiN bilayers on poly- Si lines was measured as a function of linewidth and RTA temperature. With a Ti cap, the sheet resistance is low and independent of temperature, and the RTA process window is large.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kittl, J.A. et al., Symp. on VLSI Tech., Digest of Technical Papers, p. 103 (1997).Google Scholar
2. Clevenger, L.A. et al., IBM J. Res. Develop. 39(4), p. 403 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Maex, K., Materials Science and Engineering, RI 1, Nos. 2–3 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Yamazaki, T. et al., Proceedings IEDM, 6.7.1 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Berti, A.C. and Bolkhovsky, V., Proc. of the 1992 VMIC Conf, p. 267 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Tung, R-T. and Schrey, F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67(15), p. 2164 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Wang, Q.F. et al., 1995 Symp of VLSI Tech. Digest of Technical Papers, p. 17 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Sukegawa, T. et al., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 36, p 6244 (1997).Google Scholar
9. Setton, M., Ph. D. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania (1990).Google Scholar
10. Murarka, S.P., Silicides for VLSI Applications, Academic Press, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
11. d'Heurle, F.M. and Peterson, C.S., Thin Solid Films 128, p. 283 (1985).10.1016/0040-6090(85)90080-XGoogle Scholar
12. Lien, C.D., Nicolet, M.A. and Lau, S.S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 40, p. 684 (1982).Google Scholar
13. Lau, S.S., Mayer, J.W. and Tu, K.N., J. Appl. Phys. 49(7), p. 4005 (1978).10.1063/1.325359Google Scholar
14. Gaskell, D.R, Introduction to Metallurgical Thermodynamics, McGraw Hill, NewYork 1981.Google Scholar