Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-t9bwh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-19T06:37:43.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Incommensurate Structure in Al-rich TiAl Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

S. Wang
Affiliation:
School of Metallurgy and Materials, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, England
D. Fort
Affiliation:
School of Metallurgy and Materials, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, England
I. P. Jones
Affiliation:
School of Metallurgy and Materials, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, England
J. S. Abell
Affiliation:
School of Metallurgy and Materials, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, England
Get access

Abstract

The microstructures of Ti-Al alloys in the range 56–62 at.% Al have been studied. These compounds consist of a basic L10 structure on which is superimposed an irrational modulation (Ti3Al5 related). This is incommensurate by occupation. It has two-dimensional modulations in which the wave vectors are q1 = α(a* + b*) and q2 = α(-a* + b*) where a* and b* are the L10 reciprocal basis and α is an irrational fraction. α decreases from 0.282 to 0.26 as the Al concentration increases to 60 at.% Al, i.e., the positions of the satellites change continuously with varying Al concentration. A third phase, TiAl2, appears at a composition of 62 at.% Al which means that no Ti3Al5 (62.5 at.% Al) of stoichiometric composition can ever exist.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Also IRC in Materials for High Performance Applications, The University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, England

References

REFERENCES

1. Miida, R., Hashimoto, S. and Watanabe, D., Japanese J. Appl. Phy., 21, L59 (1982).Google Scholar
2. Nakano, T., Matsumoto, K., Seno, T., Oma, K. and Umakoshi, Y., Phil. Mag. A, 74, 251 (1996).Google Scholar
3. Nakano, T., Hagihara, K., Seno, T., Sumida, N., Yamaoto, M. and Umakoshi, Y., Phil. Mag. Lett., 78, 385 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Loiseau, A. and Lasalmonie, A., Acta Cryst., B39, 580 (1983).Google Scholar
5. Loiseau, A., Lasalmonie, A., Van Tendeloo, G., Van Landuyt, J. and Amelincks, S., Acta Cryst., B41, 411 (1985).10.1107/S0108768185002385Google Scholar
6. Inui, H., Chikugo, K., Kishida, K. and Yamaguchi, M., ICEM 14, Cancun, Mexico, p 175 (1998).Google Scholar
7. Janssen, T., Janner, A., Looijenga-Vos, A. and de Wolff, P. M., International Table for Crystallography, Vol. C, Chaper 9.8. (1995).Google Scholar
8. Inui, H., Matsumuro, M., Wu, D. H. and Yamaguchi, M., Phil. Mag. A, 75, 395 (1997).Google Scholar
9. Sauvage, M. and Parthé, E., Acta Cryst., A28, 607 (1972).Google Scholar
10. De Wolff, P. M., Acta Cryst., A40, 34 (1984).Google Scholar
11. Chung, C. Y., Zou, W. H., Han, X. D., Lam, C. W. H., Gao, M., Duan, X. F. and Lai, J. K. L., Acta Mater., 46, 5541 (1998).Google Scholar