Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:00:27.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Implantation Induced Charge Trapping and Interface States Generation in Si-SiO2 System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

H. Wong  and
N. W. Cheung
H. Wong
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley CA 94720
N. W. Cheung
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley CA 94720
Get access

Abstract

Constant-voltage stressing has been used to investigate the damage of SiO2 and the Si/SiO2 interface induced by silicon implantation through polysilicon/SiO2/P-Si structures annealed at 950°C. The implant doses used were from 5×1011cm-2 to 1014cm-2. Although no detectable interface states density was observed after the annealing for implant doses less than 2×1013cm-2, interface states generation, hole trapping, and electron trapping were found to be greatly enhanced by the Si implantation. The interface states density generation rate was found to increase with higher implant doses. The density of hole trapping centers saturated at a value of 3×1012cm-2 for implant doses higher than 2×1012cm∼-2. The density of electron trapping centers was found to increase with implant dose, while the associated trapping cross section was much smaller than that of the unimplant oxide.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 54: Symposium E – Thin Films–Interfaces and Phenomena , 1985 , 579
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Young, D.R., DiMaria, D. J., Hunter, W.R., and Serrano, C.M., IBM J. Res. Develop., 22, 289(1978)Google Scholar
2 DiMaria, D. J., Young, D. R.. DeKeersmaecker, R. F., Hunter, W. R., and Serrano, C. M., J. Appl. Phys. 49, 5441(1978)Google Scholar
3 DeKeersmaecker, R. F. and DiMaria, D. J., J. Appl. Phys., 51 (2), 1085(1980)Google Scholar
4 Wong, H. and Cheung, N. W., Material Research Society Symposia Proceedings, Vol. 45, 53(1985) San Francisco, California Google Scholar
5 Termán, L. M., Solid-State Electron., 5, 285(1962)Google Scholar
6 Nissan-Cohen, Y., Shappir, J. and Frohman-Bentchkowsky, D., J. Appl. Phys. 58, 2252 (1985)Google Scholar
7 Zaininger, K. H., Appl. Phys. Lett., 8, 140(1966)Google Scholar
8 Grove, A. S. and Snow, E. H., Proc. IEEE, 54, 894 (1966)Google Scholar
9 Ning, T. H. and Yi, H. N., J. Appl. Phys. 45, 5373 (1974)Google Scholar