Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:00:08.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hydrogen as Fuel for Urban Transportation Environmental Footprint of Different Hydrogen Production Routes and the Influence on the Total Life Cycle of FC Powered Transportation Systems: An LCA Case Study within CUTE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Marc Binder ,
Michael Faltenbacher  and
Matthias Fischer
Marc Binder
Affiliation:
m.binder@pe-europe.com, PE Europe, Hauptstrasse 111-113, Stuttgart, N/A, 70771, Germany
Michael Faltenbacher
Affiliation:
xxx@mrs.org
Matthias Fischer
Affiliation:
xxx@mrs.org
Get access

Abstract

Fuel cells have the potential to offer an alternative propulsion system to convential internal combustion engines used in transportation at the present time. As a result fuel cells may provide consumers a cleaner and more efficient technology. Fuel cells are powered with hydrogen fuel which can be produced from various energy sources, which include renewable sources of energy or conventional fossil fuel. Thus, the emerging hydrogen infrastructure needs to be addressed carefully.

A consortium of industries, research institutes and several European cities launched the EU-project CUTE (Clean Urban Transport in Europe), whose aim is not only to develop and demonstrate 30 fuel cell busses and the accompanying infrastructure in 10 European cities, but also assess the environmental impacts. Within the project scope the potential of fuel cell powered transport systems for reducing environmental influences such as greenhouse effect, improving the quality of the atmosphere and conserving fossil resources is assessed. This first large scale test run of fuel cell transportation systems is the best possible information base to give real life numbers about environmental impacts of a fuel cell system including hydrogen used as fuel.

Meanwhile the use of hydrogen fuel is mostly considered as environmental friendly. However a statement about the actual environmental impacts is only possible by regarding the entire Life Cycle of the hydrogen, which include its production and use. Within CUTE different routes of the hydrogen production have been assessed: hydrogen production via electrolysis and steam reforming, considering different boundary conditions, e.g. country specific energy production/ supply, different ways for electricity production (e.g. wind power, geothermal energy etc.) etc.

This presentation will show the environmental footprint of these routes (Life Cycle Assessment results), which enable the comparison of the environmental impacts of the different hydrogen production routes and the transportation system considering the total life cycle (production of FC bus, operation and end of life) along with diesel and natural gas as “conventional” fuels for bus operation.

Keywords

environmentally benignenvironmentally protectivehydrogenation
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 895: Symposium G – Life-Cycle Analysis Tools for “Green” Materials and Process Selection , 2005 , 0895-G02-02
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 CUTE Project: http://www.fuel-cell-bus-club.com

2 ECTOS Project: http://www.ectos.is/

3 STEP Project: http://www.dpi.wa.gov.au/fuelcells/index.html

4 N.N. (2004): CUTE hydrogen infrastructure and bus technology brochure, EC funded project under the 5th FP, Contract No. NNE-2000-00113

5 European Committee for Standardisation (1997-2000): EN ISO 14040-43, Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment

6 European Committee for Standardisation (1997-2000): EN ISO 14040-43, Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment

7 Faltenbacher, , Michael, et al. (2004): Hydrogen supply in the CUTE/ ECTOS Projects – An LCA Comparison of different hydrogen supply routes (first results for electrolyser route), International German Hydrogen Energy Day, Essen, Germany Google Scholar

8 For information on the exeact date and additional information, please visit www.fuel-cell-bus-club.com

9 Gagnon, L.; van de Vate, J. (1997): Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Hydropower, Energy Policy Volume 25, No.1, S. 7–13, Elsevier Science Ltd., London Google Scholar

10 Gagnon, L.; van de Vate, J. (1997): Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Hydropower, Energy Policy Volume 25, No.1, S. 7–13, Elsevier Science Ltd., London Google Scholar

11 GWP: Global Warming Potetial

12 EP: Eutrophication Potential

13 AP: Acidification Potential

14 POCP: Phozochemical Ozone Creation Potential

15 Zittel, W. (1997): Untersuchung zum Kenntnisstand über Methanemissionen beim Export von Erdgas aus Ruβland nach Deutschland, im Auftrag der Ruhrgas AGGoogle Scholar

16 Reichert, j. et al. (2000): Methanemission durch den Einsatz von Gas in Deutschland von 1990-97 mit einem Ausblick auf 2010, KarlsruheGoogle Scholar