Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:24:55.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High-Density Feedthrough Technology for Hermetic Biomedical Micropackaging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2013

Emma C. Gill
Affiliation:
Morgan Technical Ceramics-Alberox, 225 Theodore Rice Boulevard, New Bedford, MA 02745, U.S.A.
John Antalek
Affiliation:
Morgan Technical Ceramics-Alberox, 225 Theodore Rice Boulevard, New Bedford, MA 02745, U.S.A.
Fred M. Kimock
Affiliation:
Four Circle, Incorporated, 2961 Magnolia Circle, Macungie, PA 18062, U.S.A.
Patrick J. Nasiatka
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering–Electrophysics, University of Southern California, University Park, MC-0483, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0483, U.S.A.
Ben P. McIntosh
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering–Electrophysics, University of Southern California, University Park, MC-0483, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0483, U.S.A.
Armand R. Tanguay Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering–Electrophysics, University of Southern California, University Park, MC-0483, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0483, U.S.A.
James D. Weiland
Affiliation:
University of Southern California, 1355 San Pablo Street, Los Angeles, CA 90033, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Implantable electronic biomedical devices are used clinically to diagnose and treat an increasing number of medical conditions. Such devices typically employ hermetic packages that often incorporate electrical feedthroughs made with conventional ceramic-to-metal bonding technologies. This sealing technology is well established and provides robust hermetic seals, but is limited in both the number and spacing of electrical leads. Emerging devices for interfacing with the human nervous system, however, will require a large number of external electrical leads implemented in a miniaturized packaging configuration. Commercially available feedthrough technologies are currently incapable of providing external electrical contacts with spacings as small as 200 to 400 microns, and thus are neither compatible with integrated circuit I/O (input/output) pad spacings nor with miniature implantable packages. We report the development of a hermetic high-density feedthrough (HDF) technology that allows for conductive path densities as high as 1,000 per cm2, and that is capable of supporting neural interface devices. The fabrication process utilizes multilayer high temperature co-fired ceramic (HTCC) technology in conjunction with platinum leads. Before co-firing, green alumina substrates are interleaved with linear, parallel Pt trace arrays in either wire or thin foils to form the electrical feedthroughs. Layered stacks of spatially isolated traces are first compacted into a composite, and then fired to achieve densification. After firing, the densified multilayered composite compacts are sliced perpendicular to the Pt traces and lapped to produce multiple feedthrough arrays with a high density of leads (conductors). Both hermeticity and biocompatibility of such implantable feedthroughs are important, as both moisture and positive mobile ion contamination from the saline environment of the human body can lead to compromised performance or catastrophic failure. HDFs fabricated using this process with 100 conductors and lead-to-lead spacings as low as 400 microns have been helium leak tested repeatedly and found to exceed industry-accepted standards with helium leak rates in the range of 10–11 mbar-l/s. The spacing of the current prototype matches industry standard neural interface technology, and can be scaled to higher densities with lead-to-lead spacings as small as 200 microns. The reported HDF process has several distinct advantages over prior approaches, including the provision of a large number of conductive feedthrough leads suitable for flip-chip bonding with sub-mm lead-to-lead spacings (pitch), and the incorporation of materials (alumina and platinum) that are already used in medical implants. The implementation of such an HDF technology allows for significant package miniaturization, allowing greater flexibility in surgical placement as well as less invasive procedures for implantable electronic biomedical devices.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Stieglitz, T., Microsystems Technology, 16, 723724, (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeb, G. E., Bak, M. K., Salcman, M., and Schmidt, E. M., IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 24(2), 121128, (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodger, D. C., Fong, A. J., Li, W., Ameri, H., Ahuja, A. K., Gutierrez, C., Lavrov, I., Zhong, H., Menon, P. R., Meng, E. Burdick, J. W., Roy, R. R., Edgerton, R., Weiland, J. D., Humayun, M. S., and Tai, Y.-C., Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 132(2), 449460, (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Najafi, K., in Micromachining and Microfabrication Process Technology VIII, Yasaitis, J., Perez-Maher, M., and Karam, J., Eds., Proceedings of the SPIE, 4979, 119, (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, X., Wang, J., Liu, C., Carlisle, J. A., Mech, B., Greenberg, R., Guven, D., Freda, R., Humayun, M. S., Weiland, J., and Auciello, O., Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 77B(2), 273281, (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cogan, S. F., Edell, D. J., Guzellan, A. A., Liu, Y. P., and Edell, R., Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A, 67A (3), 856867, (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S., Bhandari, R., Klein, M., Nagi, S., Rieth, L., Tathireddy, P., Toepper, M., Oppermann, H., and Solzbacher, F., 11, 453466, (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, J.-M., Tathireddy, P., Rieth, L., Normann, R. A., and Solzbacher, F., Thin Solid Films, 516(1), 3441, (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, J.-M., Rieth, L., Normann, R. A., Tathireddy, P., and Solzbacher, F., IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 56(1), 2329, (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar