Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:27:46.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High rate etching of GaAs and GaP by gas cluster ion beams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Masahiro Nagano
Affiliation:
Electrical Physics Department, Komae Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI), 2–11–1 Iwado Kita, Komaeshi, Tokyo 201–8511, Japan
Shingo Houzumi
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Advanced Science & Technology for Industry, Himeji Institute of Technology, 3–1–2 Kouto, Kamigori, Ako, Hyogo 678–1205, Japan
Noriaki Toyoda
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Advanced Science & Technology for Industry, Himeji Institute of Technology, 3–1–2 Kouto, Kamigori, Ako, Hyogo 678–1205, Japan
Susumu Yamada
Affiliation:
Electrical Physics Department, Komae Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI), 2–11–1 Iwado Kita, Komaeshi, Tokyo 201–8511, Japan
Shirabe Akita
Affiliation:
Electrical Physics Department, Komae Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI), 2–11–1 Iwado Kita, Komaeshi, Tokyo 201–8511, Japan
Isao Yamada
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Advanced Science & Technology for Industry, Himeji Institute of Technology, 3–1–2 Kouto, Kamigori, Ako, Hyogo 678–1205, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Gas cluster ion beam (GCIB) techniques have recently been proposed as new processing methods. We have been investigating the characteristics of GCIB techniques through sputtering GaAs and GaP by Ar gas cluster ion beams as a function of cluster size and acceleration energy. The Ar cluster size was selected by a magnetic spectrometer, and was obtained from the mass spectra measured by a time of flight mass spectrometer. The average sputtering yields of GaAs and GaP were 0–47 and 0–66 atoms/ion for 5–30 k V, respectively. The sputtering yields of GaAs and GaP were higher than those of an Ar monomer ion.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Yamada, I., Brown, W. L., Northby, J. A. and Sosnowski, M., Nucl. Instrum. & Methods B79, 223 (1993).Google Scholar
2. Nakamura, K., Tsui, D. C., Nihey, F., Toyoshima, H. and Itoh, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 385 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Sasa, S., Miller, M. S., Li, Y. J., Xu, Z., Ensslin, K. and Petroff, P. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 2259 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Yamada, I., Matsuo, J., Jones, E. C., Takeuchi, D., Aoki, T., Goto, K. and Sugi, T., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 438, 363 (1997).Google Scholar
5. Toyoda, N., Houzumi, S., Swanson, D. R. and Yamada, I., 4th Workshop on Cluster Ion Beam and Advanced Quantum Beam Process Technology, Tokyo Fashion Town Bulding, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan, September 10–12, 2003 pp. 135.Google Scholar
6. Matsuo, J., Toyoda, N., Akizuki, M. and Yamada, I., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B121 (1997) 459.Google Scholar
7. Yamada, I., Matsuo, J., Toyoda, N. and Kirkpatrick, A., Mat. Sci. & Eng. R34 (2001) 231.Google Scholar
8. Ziegler, J.F., Biersack, J.P. and Littmark, U., “The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids”, Pergamon Press, New York, 1985.Google Scholar