Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:42:53.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Heteroepitaxy and Characterization of Inp and GaInP on Silicon for Solar Cell Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

M.M. Al-Jassim
Affiliation:
Solar Energy Research Institute, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO 80401
R.K. Ahrenkiel
Affiliation:
Solar Energy Research Institute, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO 80401
M.W. Wanlass
Affiliation:
Solar Energy Research Institute, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO 80401
J.M. Olson
Affiliation:
Solar Energy Research Institute, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO 80401
S.M. Vernon
Affiliation:
SPIRE Corporation, Patriots Park, Bedford, MA 01730
Get access

Abstract

InP and GaInP layers were heteroepitaxially grown on (100) Si substrates by atmospheric pressure MOCVD. TEM and photoluminescence (PL) were used to measure the defect density and the minority carrier lifetime in these structures. The direct growth of InP on Si resulted in either polycrystalline or heavily faulted single-crystal layers. The use of GaAs buffer layers in InP/Si structures gave rise to significantly improved morphology and reduced the threading dislocation density. The best InP/Si layers in this study were obtained by using GaAs-GaInAs graded buffers. Additionally, the growth of high quality GaInP on Si was demonstrated. The minority carrier lifetime of 7 ns in these layers is the highest of any III-V/Si semiconductor measured in our laboratory.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Mat. Res. Soc. Syrp. Proc. 116, and L4.Google Scholar
2. Wanlass, M.W., Gessert, T.A., Emery, K.A. and Coutts, T.J., Proc. 20th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, Sept. 26-30, 491-(1988).Google Scholar
3. Yamamoto, A., Uchida, N. and Yamaguchi, M., J. Crys. Growth 90, 369 (1989).10.1016/0022-0248(89)90535-6Google Scholar
4. Keavney, C.J., Vernon, S.M., Haven, V.E., Wojtczuk, S.J., and Al-Jassim, M.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 5A (12), 1139 (1989).10.1063/1.100741Google Scholar
5. Wuu, D.S., Tung, H.H., Horng, R.H. and Lee, M.K., J. Appl. Phys. 65(3), 1213 (1989).Google Scholar
6. Horikawa, H., Akiyama, M., Onozawa, S., Kawai, Y. and Sakuta, M., Appl Surface Science 41/42, 598 (1989).10.1016/0169-4332(89)90129-3Google Scholar
7. Olson, J.M., Kurtz, S.R., Kibbler, A.E. and Faine, P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56 (7), 623(1990).Google Scholar
8. Schaus, C.F., Schaff, W.J. and Shealy, J.R., J. Cryst. Growth 77, 360 (1986).10.1016/0022-0248(86)90324-6Google Scholar
9. Hino, I. and Suzuki, T., J. Cryst. Growth 63, 483 (1984).10.1016/0022-0248(84)90454-8Google Scholar
10. Kawai, H., Kobayashi, T., Nakamura, F., and Taira, K., Electron. Lett. 609 (1989).Google Scholar
11. Vernon, S.M., Keavney, C.J., Gagnon, E.D., Karam, N.H., Al-Jassim, M.M., Haegel, N.M., Mazzi, V.P. and Wie, C.R., in this volume.Google Scholar
12. Ahrenkiel, R.K., Dunlavy, D.J., and Hanak, T., Solar Cells 24, 339 (1988).10.1016/0379-6787(88)90086-5Google Scholar
13. Pirouz, P., Ernst, F. and Cheng, T.T., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 116, 57 (1988).10.1557/PROC-116-57Google Scholar
14. Blakeslee, A.E., Al-Jassim, M.M., Olson, J.M. and Jones, K.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 116, 313 (1988).10.1557/PROC-116-313Google Scholar
15. Al-Jassim, M.M., Nishioka, T., Itoh, Y., Yamamoto, A. and Yamaguchi, M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 116, 141 (1988).10.1557/PROC-116-141Google Scholar
16. Wanlass, M.W., Sheldon, P., “Improved Substrate Structures for InP-Based Devices”, U.S. patent to be issued 8/90.Google Scholar
17. Wanlass, M.W., Ward, J.S., Gessert, T.A., Emery, K.A., Horner, G.S. and Coutts, T.J., Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on InP and Related Materials, Denver, CO, April 1990, to be published.Google Scholar
18. Ahrenkiel, R. K., Dunlavy, D. J., Loo, R. Y., and Kamath, G. S., J. Appl. Phys. 63, 5174(1988).10.1063/1.340423Google Scholar