Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:18:44.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth and Structure of Ti2O3 and TiO2 Thin Films on (0001) α-Al2O3 Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

T. Wagner
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung, Seestrasse 92, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
M. Agarwal
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung, Seestrasse 92, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Titanium oxide thin films were grown at different temperatures on (0001) α-Al2O3 substrates by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). The films grown at room temperature were amorphous. Annealing at 1223K of 6 nm thick films led to the formation of TiO2 with an epitaxial orientation relationship (100)<001>TiO2 ∥ (0001)<01101>Al2O3 with the substrate. However, on similar heat treatment, thicker 100 nm films formed polycrystalline TiO2. At a deposition temperature of 1223K epitaxial Ti2O3 films with orientation relationship (0001)<2110>Ti2O3 ∥ (0001)<21101>Al2O3 were formed. The lattice mismatch between Ti2O3 and α-Al2O3 was accomodated by a regular arrangement of misfit dislocations at the Ti2O3/α-Al2O3 interface. By comparing the microstructural evolution of the annealed films with that of those films grown at high temperature, mechanisms governing grain growth in polycrystalline titanium oxide films were discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Henrich, V. E. and Cox, P. A., The Surface Science of Metal Oxides. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994).Google Scholar
2. Frost, H. J., Parker, M. A., Ross, C. A. and Holm, E. A., Polycrystalline Thin Films: Structure-Texture. Properties, and Applications II. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 403 Pittsburgh, PA, 1996).Google Scholar
3. Fujii, T., Sakata, N., Takada, J., Miura, Y., Daitho, Y. and Takano, M., J. Mater. Res. 9, 1468 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Strecker, A., Salzberger, U. and Mayer, J., Prakt. Metallogr. 30, 481 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Miller, K. T., Chan, C. J., Cain, M. G. and Lange, F. F., J. Mater. Res. 8, 169 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Lange, F. F., Science 273, 903 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Palmer, J. E., Thompson, C. V. and Smith, H. I., J. Appl. Phys. 62, (1987).Google Scholar
8. Kim, H.-J. and Thompson, C. V., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 757 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Anderson, S., Collen, B., Kuylenstierna, U. and Magnéli, A., Acta Chem. Scand. 11, 1641 (1957).Google Scholar
10. Alexander, K. B., Walker, F. J., McKee, R. A. and F. L. , III, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 1737 (1990).Google Scholar
11. Wagner, T. and Duscher, G., to be published.Google Scholar
12. Merwe, J. H. v. d., Crit. Rev. in Sol. Stat. and Mat. Sci. 17, 187 (1991).Google Scholar