Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-23T02:39:04.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth and Characterization of Zn1-xMnxSe1-ySy Epilayers and Related Heterostructures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

F. S. Flack
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16801 SEDD, The Army Research Laboratory, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060
N. Samarth
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16801 SEDD, The Army Research Laboratory, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060
F. Semendy
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16801 SEDD, The Army Research Laboratory, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060
Get access

Abstract

We describe the growth of (Zn,Mn)(S,Se) epitaxial layers of high structural quality on (100) GaAs substrates. Double crystal x-ray diffraction (DCXRD) measurements indicate that quaternary epilayers nearly lattice-matched with GaAs are characterized by DCXRD curves with a foil width at half maximum in the range 30 – 60 arc seconds. Photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy is employed to map the variation of the energy gap of the quartenary alloys over a wide range of alloy compositions. Finally, temperature dependent PL is used to examine the viability of (Zn,Mn)(S,Se) alloys as confining layers for ZnSe and (Zn,Cd)Se quantum wells. While efficient exciton confinement is demonstrated through the observation of robust PL from such quantum wells up to high temperatures, the renormalization of the quartenary band gap by spin fluctuations leads to a rapid decrease in confinement with increase in temperature.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Awschalom, D.D. and Samarth, N., in Optics of Semiconductor Nanostructures, eds. Hennenberger, F., Schmitt-Rink, S. and Gobel, E.O. (Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1993) and references therein.Google Scholar
2.Dai, N. et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3824 (1991);Google Scholar
Chou, W.C. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 3820 (1991).Google Scholar
3.Crooker, S.A. et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 508 (1995);Google Scholar
Crooker, S.A., Baumberg, J.J., Flack, F., Samarth, N. and Awschalom, D.D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2814 (1996).Google Scholar
4. A review of early work on MS heterostructures may be found in Gunshor, R.L., Kolodziejski, L.A., Nurmikko, A.V. and Otsuka, N., Ann. Rev. Mat. Sci. 18, 325 (1988).Google Scholar
5.Neumark, G.F., Park, R.M. and DePuydt, J.M., Physics Today 47, 26 (1994).Google Scholar
6.Karasawa, T., et al. J. Crystal Growth 32, No. 11B, L1657 (1993).Google Scholar
7.Chen, Y.P. et al. in Opto-electronic Materials: Ordering, Composition Modulation and Self-assembled Structures, eds. Jones, E.D., Mascarenhas, A. and Petroff, P.M. (MRS Symposia Proceedings, Vol 417, 1996), p. 337.Google Scholar
8.Pessa, M. et al. Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 187, 337 (1995);Google Scholar
9.Hutchins, J.W. et al. J. Crystal Growth 159, 50 (1996).Google Scholar
10.Kim, C.C. and Sivananthan, S., Phys. Rev. B 53, 1475 (1996).Google Scholar
11.Bylsma, R.B. et al. , Phys. Rev. B 33, 8207 (1986).Google Scholar
12.Varshni, Y.P., Physica 34, 149 (1967).Google Scholar