Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T13:09:42.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Grain Boundary Segregation in Titanium Dioxide: Evaluation of Relative Driving Forces for Segregation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Qinglei Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and the Materials Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, U.S.A.
Guoda D. Lian
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and the Materials Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, U.S.A.
Elizabeth C. Dickey*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and the Materials Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Solute segregation to grain boundaries is a fundamental phenomenon in polycrystalline metal-oxide electroceramics that has enormous implications for the macroscopic dielectric behavior of the materials. This paper presents a systematic study of solute segregation in a model dielectric, titanium dioxide. We investigate the relative role of the electrostatic versus strain energy driving forces for segregation by studying yttrium-doped specimens. Through analytical transmission electron microscopy studies, we quantitatively determine the segregation behavior of the material. The measured Gibbsian interfacial excesses are compared to thermodynamic predictions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Yan, M. F. and Rhodes, W. W., “Effects of Solutes on the Grain Boundary Mobility of TiO2,” Ceramic Microstructures '86: Role of Interfaces, Mat. Sci. Res., 21, 519, ed. by Pash, J. A. and Evans, A. G., Plenum Press, New York, 1987.Google Scholar
2. Hwang, S. –L., Chen, I.-W.. “Grain Size Control of Tetragonal Zirconia Polycrystals Using the Space Charge Concept,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73 [11] 3267 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Cho, J., Wang, C.M., Chan, H.M., Rickman, J.M. and Harmer, M.P., “Role of Segregating Dopants on the Improved Creep Resistance of Aluminum Oxide,” Acta Mater., 47 4197 (1999).Google Scholar
4. Wang, C. M., Cho, J. H., Chan, H. M., et al., “Influence of Dopant Concentration on Creep Properties of Nd2O3-Doped Alumina,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 84, 1010 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Waser, R. and Hagenbeck, R., “Grain Boundaries in Dielectric and Mixed-Conducting Ceramics,” Acta Mater., 48, 797 (2000).Google Scholar
6. McLean, D., Grain Boundaries in Metals. Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K., 1957.Google Scholar
7. Frenkel, J., Kinetic Theory of Liquids. Oxford University Press, New York, 1946 Google Scholar
8. Lehovec, K., “Space-Charge Layer and Distribution of Lattice Defects at the Surface of Ionic Crystals,” J. Chem. Phys., 21 [7] 1123 (1953).Google Scholar
9. Kliewer, K. L. and Koehler, J. S., “Space Charge in Ionic Crystals. I. General Approach with Application to NaCl,” Phys. Rev., 140 [4A] 1226 (1965).Google Scholar
10. Merkerk, M. J., Middelhius, B. J. and Burggraff, A. J., “Effect of Grain Boundaries on the Conductivity of High-Purity ZrO2-Y2O3 Ceramics,” Solid State Ionics, 6, 159 (1982).Google Scholar
11. Dickey, E. C., Fan, X. D., and Pennycook, S. J., “Structure and chemistry of yttria-stabilized cubic-zirconia symmetric tilt grain boundaries,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 84 [6] 1361 (2001).Google Scholar
12. Desu, S. B. and Payne, D. A., “Interfacial Segregation in Perovskite: II, Experimental Evidence,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 73 [11] 3398 (1990).Google Scholar
13. Chiang, Y. M. and Takagi, T., “Grain Boundary Chemistry of Barium Titanate and Strontium Titanate: I, High Temperature Equilibrium Space Charge,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 73 [11] 3278–85 (1990).Google Scholar
14. Ikeda, J. A. S. and Chiang, Y. M., “Space Charge Segregation at Grain Boundaries in Titanium Dioxide: I, Relationship between Lattice Defect Chemistry and Space Charge Potential,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 76 [10] 2437–46 (1993).Google Scholar
15. Ikeda, J. A. S., Chiang, Y. M., Garratt-Reed, A. J. and Sande, J. B. V., “Space Charge Segregation at Grain Boundaries in Titanium Dioxide: II, Model Experiments,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 76 [10] 2447–59 (1993).Google Scholar
16. Baumard, J. F. and Tani, E., “Electrical Conductivity and Charge Compensation in Nb doped TiO2 Rutile,” J. Chem. Phys., 67 [3] 857 (1977).Google Scholar
17. Terwilliger, C. D. and Chiang, Y. M., “Size-dependent Solute Segregation and Total Solubility in Ultrafine Polycrytals: Ca in TiO2 ,” Acta Metall. Mater., 43 [1] 319 (1995).Google Scholar
18. Yan, M. F., Cannon, R. M. and Bowen, H. K., “Space Charge, elastic field and dipole contributions to equilibrium solute segregation at interfaces,” J. Appl. Phys., 54 [2] 764 (1983).Google Scholar
19. DTSA software is available at www.nist.gov/dtsa.Google Scholar
20. Williams, D. B. and Carter, C. B., Transmission Electron Microscopy, New York: Plenum Press, 1996.Google Scholar
21. Watanabe, M., Horita, Z., Nemoto, M., “Absorption Correction and Thickness Determination using the ζ factor in quantitative X-ray microanalysis,” Ultramicroscopy, 65 187 (1996).Google Scholar
22. Smyth, D. M., The Defect Chemistry of Metal Oxides, Oxford University Press, New York, 2000.Google Scholar
23. Brown, K. R., Bonnell, D. A.Segregation in Yttrium Aluminum Garnet: II, Theoretical Calculatioins,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 82 [9] 2431–41 (1999).Google Scholar
24. Poeppel, R. B. and Blakely, J. M., “Origin of Equilibrium Space Charge Potentials in Ionic Crystals,” Surf Sci., 15, 507 (1969).Google Scholar
25. Catlow, C. R. A., James, R., Machrodt, W. C. and Stewart, R. F., “Defect Energetics in α-Al2O3 and Rutile TiO2 ,” Phys. Rev. B, 25, 1006 (1982).Google Scholar
26. Sayle, D. C., Catlow, C. R. A., Perrin, M. A. and Nortier, P., “Computer Simulation Study of the Defect Chemistry of Rutile TiO2 ,” J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 56 [6] 799 (1995).Google Scholar