Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T16:49:31.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geometric confinement governs the rupture strength of H-bond assemblies at a critical length scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Sinan Keten
Affiliation:
keten@mit.edu, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Room 1-337, Cambridge, MA, 01239, United States
Markus J. Buehler
Affiliation:
mbuehler@mit.edu, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 77 Massachusetts Avenue,, Cambridge, MA, 02139, United States
Get access

Abstract

Using theoretical considerations and MD simulation techniques, we show that the rupture strength of H-bond assemblies is governed by geometric confinement effects, suggesting that clusters of at most 3-4 H-bonds break concurrently, even under uniform shear loading of a much larger number of H-bonds. This universally valid result leads to an intrinsic strength limitation that suggests that shorter strands with less H-bonds achieve the highest shear strength. Our finding explains how the intrinsic strength limitation of H-bonds is overcome by the formation of a nanocomposite structure of H-bond clusters, thereby enabling the formation larger, much stronger beta-sheet structures. Our results explain recent experimental proteomics data, suggesting a correlation between the shear strength and the prevalence of beta-strand lengths in biology.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Lakes, R., Nature 361,511 (1993).Google Scholar
[2] Wegst, U. G. K., and Ashby, M. F, Philosophical Magazine 84,2167 (2004).Google Scholar
[3] Aizenberg, J. et al. , Science 309,275 (2005).Google Scholar
[4] Arzt, E., Gorb, S., and Spolenak, R., PNAS 100,10603 (2003).Google Scholar
[5] Buehler, M. J, PNAS 103,12285 (2006).Google Scholar
[6] Lu, H., and Schulten, K., Biophysical journal 79,51 (2000).Google Scholar
[7] Lee, E. H et al. , Structure (London, England: 1993) 14,497 (2006).Google Scholar
[8] Rief, M. et al. , Biophysical journal 75,3008 (1998).Google Scholar
[9] Rief, M. et al. , Science 276,1109 (1997).Google Scholar
[10] Brockwell, D. J et al. , Nature structural biology 10,731 (2003).Google Scholar
[11] Grater, F. et al. , Biophysical journal 88,790 (2005).Google Scholar
[12] Rohs, R., Etchebest, C., and Lavery, R., Biophysical journal 76,2760 (1999).Google Scholar
[13] West, D. K et al. , Biophysical journal 90,287 (2006).Google Scholar
[14] Sotomayor, M., and Schulten, K., Science 316,1144 (2007).Google Scholar
[15] Ackbarow, T. et al. , PNAS, 0705759104 (2007).Google Scholar
[16] Hyeon, C., and Thirumalai, D., Journal of Physics-Condensed Matter 19 (2007).Google Scholar
[17] Rief, M. et al. , Journal of Molecular Biology 286,553 (1999).Google Scholar
[18] Oberhauser, A. F et al. , Nature 393,181 (1998).Google Scholar
[19] Isralewitz, B., Gao, M., and Schulten, K., Current opinion in structural biology 11,224 (2001).Google Scholar
[20] MacKerell, A. D et al. , Journal of Physical Chemistry B 102,3586 (1998).Google Scholar
[21] Nelson, M. T et al. , International Journal of Supercomputer Applications and High Performance Computing 10,251 (1996).Google Scholar
[22] Bernstein, F. C et al. , Journal of Molecular Biology 112,535 (1977).Google Scholar
[23] Bell, G. I, Science 200,618 (1978).Google Scholar
[24] Griffith, A. A, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, 163 (1921).Google Scholar
[25] Buehler, M. J et al. , Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering 14,799 (2006).Google Scholar
[26] Marko, J. F, and Siggia, E. D, Macromolecules 28,8759 (1995).Google Scholar
[27] Bustamante, C. et al. , Current Opinion in Structural Biology 10,279 (2000).Google Scholar
[28] Buehler, M. J, and Wong, S. Y, Biophysical Journal 93,37 (2007).Google Scholar
[29] Sheu, S. Y et al. , PNAS 100,12683 (2003).Google Scholar
[30] Penel, S. et al. , Protein engineering 16,957 (2003).Google Scholar