Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T16:39:58.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fundamental Advances in Transparent Conducting Oxides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Timothy J. Coutts
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA
David L. Young
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA
Xiaonan Li
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA
Get access

Abstract

Increasingly large-volume markets for large-area, flat-panel displays and photovoltaic panels are likely to be established in the early years of the next century and transparent conducting oxides (TCOs) of improved opto-electronic properties will be required to enable some of these applications to be realized. Our work is focusing on improving both the fabrication-limited properties of the materials (extrinsic), and materials-limited properties (intrinsic). The emphasis on achieving improved electrical and optical properties hinges on achieving higher electron mobility via intrinsic and/or extrinsic properties. To this end, we have investigated the properties of several TCOs including cadmium oxide, tin oxide, zinc oxide, cadmium stannate and zinc stannate. These may be deposited by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) or sputtering and we hope to establish the capability to fabricate compounds and alloys in the cadmium oxide, tin oxide, zinc oxide ternary phase diagram.

The properties of the materials have been investigated using a wide variety of techniques including high-resolution electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy and X-ray diffraction, as well as Mössbauer, Raman and UV/visible/NIR spectroscopies. We have measured the transport properties (conductivity, Hall, Seebeck and Nernst coefficients) and have obtained the effective mZLss, relaxation time, Fermi energy, and scattering parameter. This information has been obtained as a function of carrier concentration, which depends on the deposition and annealing procedures. We have found that the mobilities of free-electrons in the cadmiumbearing compounds are greatly superior to those in the other materials, because they have much longer electron relaxation times. In the case of cadmium oxide, there is also great benefit from a much lower effective mass. We are gaining a clearer understanding of the fundamental microscopic attributes needed for TCOs, which will be required in more-demanding, and rapidly emerging, applications.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Coutts, T. J., Mason, T. O., Perkins, J. D., et al. , in Photovoltaicsfor the 21st. Century, edited by Kapur, V. J., McConnell, R. D., Carlson, D., Ceasar, G. P. and Rohatgi, A. (The Electrochemical Society, Inc., Seattle, Washington, 1999), Vol. Proceedings Volume 99–11, p. 274.Google Scholar
2 Riordan, C., in Advances in Solar Energy, edited by Böer, K. W. (American Solar Energy Society, Inc., Boulder, Colorado, 1992), Vol. 7, p. 211238.Google Scholar
3 Edison Electric Institute, in StatisticalYearbook of the Electric Utility Industry (Edison Electric Institute, Washington, DC, 1999), Section 1, p. 7.Google Scholar
4 www.nrel.gov/ncpv”, (Facilitated by the National Center for Photovoltaics (NCPV) for the U.S. PV Industry (Prepared by Energetics, Incorporated, Columbia, Maryland), 1999).Google Scholar
5 Hill, R. H. and Nadel, S. J., Coated glass Applications and Markets (BOC Coating Technology, Fairfield, California, 1999).Google Scholar
6 Coming, C.., “Annual manufacture of coated glass”, personal e-mail communication received by Coutts, T. J., NREL, Golden, CO, 2000.Google Scholar
7 Bright, C., “Annual market for TCO-coated glass for flat-panel displays”, personal e-mail communication received by Coutts, T. J., NREL, Golden, CO, 2000.Google Scholar
8 Haacke, G., in Annual Review of Materials Science, edited by Huggins, R. A., Bube, R. H. and Roberts, R. W. (Annual Reviews, Inc., Palo Alto, California, 1977), Vol. 7, p. 73.Google Scholar
9 Coutts, T. J., Wu, X., and Mulligan, W. P., Journal of Electronic Materials 25, 935 (1996).Google Scholar
10 Kamrmler, D. R., Edwards, D. D., Ingram, B. J., et al. , in 195th. Meeting of the Electrochemical Society-Photovoltaicsfor the 21th Century, edited by Kapur, V. K., McConnel, R. D., Carlson, D., Ceasar, G. P. and Rohatgi, A. (The Electrochemical Society, Pennington, NJ, Seattle, WA, 1999), Vol. 99–11, p. 68.Google Scholar
11 Minami, T., Kakumu, T., Shimokawa, K., et al. , Thin Solid Films 317, 318 (1998).Google Scholar
12 Wu, X., Sheldon, P., Mahathongdy, Y., et al. , in NCPV Photovoltaics Program Review-Proceedings of the 15th. Conference, edited by Al-Jassim, M., Thornton, J. P. and Gee, J. M. (Am. Inst. Phys., Denver, Colorado, 1998), Vol. 462, p. 37.Google Scholar
13 Coutts, T. J., Young, D. L., Li, X., et al. , J. Vac. Sci. Technot. to be published (2000).Google Scholar
14 Siegel, A., Journal of Applied Crystallography 11, 284 (1978).Google Scholar
15 Young, D. L., Coutts, T. J., and Kaydanov, V. I., Rev. Sci. Inst. 71, 462 (2000).Google Scholar