Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T20:51:00.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fermi Surface Mapping Using A Third Generation Light Source

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Eli Rotenberg
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Oregon
J. D. Denlinger
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
S. D. Kevan
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Oregon
K. W. Goodman
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
J. G. Tobin
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
G. J. Mankey
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Louisiana State University
K. Subramanian
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Louisiana State University
Get access

Abstract

The electronic states at the Fermi surface determine diverse properties such as magnetism, chemical bonding, and phonon-electron coupling. Using a conventional hemispherical analyzer at the ultraESCA beamline 7.0 of the Advanced Light Source, we have measured Fermi contours of the bulk and surface states of Cu(001) and Ag(001). For bulk states, we used uniform sampling in k-space by varying both the electron takeoff angle as well as the photon energy. Three-dimensional plots (in k-space) of bulk and surface states at the Fermi level can easily be achieved within one or two synchrotron shifts. Surface states, whose momentum is independent of k-perpendicular, are easily mapped if sufficiently dense angular sampling is performed. The states crossing the Fermi level at X in the surface Brillouin Zone of Cu(100) and Ag(100) are presented as examples.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kevan, S. D., ed., Angle-Resolved Photoemission, (Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1992), and references therein.Google Scholar
2 Courths, R. and Htifner, S., Phys. Rep. 112(2), 53 (1984), and references therein.Google Scholar
3 Miller, T., Samsavar, A., Franklin, G. E., and Chiang, T.-C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61(12), 1404 (1988).Google Scholar
4 Aebi, P., Osterwalder, J., Fasel, R., Naumovic, D., Schlapbach, L., Surface Science 307, 917 (1994).Google Scholar
5 Stampfl, A. P. J., Foo, J. A. Con, Leckey, R. C. G., Riley, J. D., Denecke, R., Ley, L., Surface Science 331, 1272 (1995).Google Scholar
6 Santoni, A., Terminello, L. J., Himpsel, F. J., and Takahashi, T., Appl. Phys. A 52, 229 (1991).Google Scholar
7 Qu, Z., Gooneward, A., Subramanian, K., Karunamuni, J., et al, Surface Science 324, 133 (1995).Google Scholar
8 Thiry, P., PhD Thesis, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 1979.Google Scholar
9 Denlinger, J. D. et al, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 1342 (1995).Google Scholar
10 Warwick, T., Heimann, P., mossessian, D., Mckinney, W., and Padmore, H., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 2037 (1995).Google Scholar
11 Rotenberg, Eli, et al., unpublished.Google Scholar
12 Rotenberg, Eli, Denlinger, J. D., Kevan, S. D., unpublished.Google Scholar