Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-14T19:44:22.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fabrication of Stimulus-Responsive Polymeric Nanostructures by Proximal Probes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Sang-Jung Ahn
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, 144 Hudson Hall, Box 90300, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, 22708
Woo-Kjung Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, 144 Hudson Hall, Box 90300, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, 22708
Stefan Zauscher
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, 144 Hudson Hall, Box 90300, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, 22708
Get access

Abstract

The triggered control of interfacial properties on the nanometer scale holds significant promise for actuation in bio-nanotechnology applications where polymeric actuators may manipulate the transport, separation, and detection of biomolecules. To fabricate patterned, stimulus-responsive polymer brushes we have developed several methods that combine surface initiated polymerization (SIP) with dip-pen nanolithography (DPN). Surface-confined, stimulus-responsive polymer brush nanopatterns were fabricated by amplification of DPN patterned, self-assembled monolayers of 16-mercaptohexadecanoic acid on gold surfaces by SIP of N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAAm). While free radical polymerization yielded only short polymer brushes (DP<50), atom transfer free radical polymerization (ATRP) produced thick, uniform polymer brushes. For free radical polymerization the thickness of the polymer brush layer is a function of the lateral feature size and the initiator density and is maximal at pattern boundaries.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Schild, H. G., Prog. Polym. Sci. 17, 163 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Duncan, R. and Kopecek, J., Adv. Polym. Sci. 57, 53 (1984).Google Scholar
3. Chen, C. S., Mrksich, M., Huang, S., Whitesides, G. M., and Ingber, D. E., Science 276, 1425 (1997).Google Scholar
4. Ista, L. K., Mendez, S., Perez-Luna, V. H., and Lopez, G. P., Langmuir 17, 2552 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Piner, R., Zhu, J., Xu, F., Hong, S., and Mirkin, C. A., Science 283, 661 (1999).Google Scholar
6. Matyjaszewski, K., et al., Macromolecules 32, 8716 (1999).Google Scholar
7. Jones, D. M. and Huck, W. T. S., Adv. Mater. 13. 1256 (2001).Google Scholar
8. Jang, J., Hong, S., Schatz, G. C., and Ratner, M. A., J. Chem. Phys. 115, 2721 (2001).Google Scholar
9. Sheehan, P. E. and Whitman, L. J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 156104 (2002).Google Scholar
10. Prucker, O., Rühe, J., Macromolecules 31, 602 (1998).Google Scholar