Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T15:39:07.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental Evidence for the Dominance of vuv Photons in Remote Hydrogen Plasma Treatments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

R. Wilken
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer-Institut fir Angewandte Polymerforschung, Kantstr. 55, 14513 Teltow, Germany
A. Hollander
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer-Institut fir Angewandte Polymerforschung, Kantstr. 55, 14513 Teltow, Germany
J. Behnisch
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer-Institut fir Angewandte Polymerforschung, Kantstr. 55, 14513 Teltow, Germany
Get access

Abstract

The flux of vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) and ultraviolet (UV) photons from a hydrogen plasma was detected by fluorescence measurements of sodium salicylate sheets with and without a MgF2 window. In order to expose the samples to the same photon flux in all experiments, the power input to the microwave plasma source was adjusted. Polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), and polystyrene (PS) were treated with VUV radiation or with a remote hydrogen plasma. The mass loss and the CH-absorption loss were recorded by in situ quartz crystal micro balance and by in situ IR reflection absorption spectroscopy, respectively. The VUV irradiation and plasma treatment caused similar effects in the case of PE, PP showed an increased polymer ablation in plasma treatments, and for PS a negligible loss in mass and CH absorption was detected in plasma and VUV treatments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hollander, A., Behnisch, J., and Wertheimer, M. R., in Plasma Processing of Polymers,NATO ASI Series, Series E: Applied Sciences - Vol.346, edited by d'Agostino, R., Favia, P., and Fracassi, F. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1997) p. 411 Google Scholar
2. Fozza, A., Roch, J., Klemberg-Sapieha, J. E., Kruse, A., Hollander, A., Wertheimer, M. R., Polymer Preprints 38/1, p. 1097 (1997)Google Scholar
3. Hudis, , Polymer Letters 10, p. 179 (1972)Google Scholar
4. Hudis, J. Appl. Pol. Sci. 16, p. 2397 (1972)Google Scholar
5. Liston, , J. Adhesion 30, p. 199 (1989)Google Scholar
6. Yasuda, , J. Macromol. Sci.-Chem. A10, p. 383 (1976)Google Scholar
7. Wilken, , Holländer, A., J. Behnisch, Plasmas and Polymers, in pressGoogle Scholar
8. Masuda, M. Kochi, S. Iwashima, H. Inokuchi, , Japan. J. Appl. Phys. 6, p. 1423 (1967)Google Scholar
9. Mai, R. Drouin, , Appl. Opt. 10, p. 207 (1971)Google Scholar
10. Watanabe, E. Inn, , J. Opt. Soc. Am. 43, p. 32 (1953)Google Scholar